20061218027209A

Accident · Destroyed

FAA accident report · Beech D95A · Gilroy, CA · December 18, 2006

Date
December 18, 2006 · 15:50 local
Place
Gilroy, CA
Phase of flight
Low Level Operations
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Operator
NZDS
Damage
Destroyed
Aircraft
N144PG
NTSB investigation
NTSBSEA07FA035
Reported as
Beech D95A
Reported engine
Lycoming IO360B1B
People aboard
3
Fatal injuries
3
Pilot’s flight hours
1,978 total215 in this make and model100 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) The actual facts that were causal to the accident remain unclear at this time. However, it appears the aircraft was on a training flight where they were conducting single engine minimum controllable airspeed flight when the aircraft entered a spin and control was lost. The only unusual condition noted during the wreckage inspection was that both the left and right hand fuel selector levers were in the "aux" position with a fuel selector panel placard reading "use of aux tank in level flight only." Two eye witness accounts saw the aircraft spiraling down until impact. Prior to this no witness has been identified that saw the aircraft experiencing trouble or no radio communications were made to indicate mechanical problems. Post accident investigation by the aircraft manufacturer, propeller and engine manufacturer say they found no evidence of mechanical malfunction or failure. A review of the aircraft records show that the required inspections had been accomplished, an airworthiness directives appear to be up-to-date and no recent maintenance activity was accomplished that may have led to a mechanical problem were noted.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) THE ACTUAL FACTS THAT WERE CAUSAL TO THE ACCIDENT REMAIN UNCLEAR AT THIS TIME. HOWEVER, IT APPEARS THE AIRCRAFT WAS ON A TRAINING FLIGHT WHERE THEY WERE CONDUCTING SINGLE ENGINE MINIMUM CONTROLLABLE AIRSPEED FLIGHT WHEN THE AIRCRAFT ENTERED A SPIN AND CONTROL WAS LOST. THE ONLY UNUSUAL CONDITION NOTED DURING THE WRECKAGE INSPECTION WAS THAT BOTH THE LEFT AND RIGHT HAND FUEL SELECTOR LEVERS WERE IN THE "AUX" POSITION WITH A FUEL SELECTOR PANEL PLACARD READING "USE OF AUX TANK IN LEVEL FLIGHT ONLY." TWO EYE WITNESS ACCOUNTS SAW THE AIRCRAFT SPIRALING DOWN UNTIL IMPACT. PRIOR TO THIS NO WITNESS HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED THAT SAW THE AIRCRAFT EXPERIENCING TROUBLE OR NO RADIO COMMUNICATIONS WERE MADE TO INDICATE MECHANICAL PROBLEMS. POST ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION BY THE AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURER, PROPELLER AND ENGINE MANUFACTURER SAY THEY FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF MECHANICAL MALFUNCTION OR FAILURE. A REVIEW OF THE AIRCRAFT RECORDS SHOW THAT THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS HAD BEEN ACCOMPLISHED, AN AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES APPEAR TO BE UP-TO-DATE AND NO RECENT MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY WAS ACCOMPLISHED THAT MAY HAVE LED TO A MECHANICAL PROBLEM WERE NOTED.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.