What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) Following the ILS approach to runway 30 at Goodland municipal airport (gld) in instrument meteorological conditions, (200 feet overcast and visibility 1 1/4 statute miles) the aircraft struck the runway right wing low, causing the right wing tip tank to impact the runway. The aircraft veered off the right side of the runway, became airborne again and banked to the left causing the left wing tip tank to impact the terrain. The aircraft crossed the runway and eventually came to rest to the left of the runway, between the runway and the parallel taxiway. The aircraft was substantially damaged with the left wing bent downward 90 degrees, approximately 3 feet inboard of the tip tank. There were no injuries. Both pilots reported that the second in command (left seat) was manipulating the flight controls during the ILS approach and the pilot in command (right seat) took control of the aircraft at 250 feet above ground level and was unable to control the aircraft due to a possible flight control malfunction. Pilot statements were conflicting regarding why and how the flight controls were transferred.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) FOLLOWING THE ILS APPROACH TO RUNWAY 30 AT GOODLAND MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (GLD) IN INSTRUMENT METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS, (200 FEET OVERCAST AND VISIBILITY 1 1/4 STATUTE MILES) THE AIRCRAFT STRUCK THE RUNWAY RIGHT WING LOW, CAUSING THE RIGHT WING TIP TANK TO IMPACT THE RUNWAY. THE AIRCRAFT VEERED OFF THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE RUNWAY, BECAME AIRBORNE AGAIN AND BANKED TO THE LEFT CAUSING THE LEFT WING TIP TANK TO IMPACT THE TERRAIN. THE AIRCRAFT CROSSED THE RUNWAY AND EVENTUALLY CAME TO REST TO THE LEFT OF THE RUNWAY, BETWEEN THE RUNWAY AND THE PARALLEL TAXIWAY. THE AIRCRAFT WAS SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGED WITH THE LEFT WING BENT DOWNWARD 90 DEGREES, APPROXIMATELY 3 FEET INBOARD OF THE TIP TANK. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. BOTH PILOTS REPORTED THAT THE SECOND IN COMMAND (LEFT SEAT) WAS MANIPULATING THE FLIGHT CONTROLS DURING THE ILS APPROACH AND THE PILOT IN COMMAND (RIGHT SEAT) TOOK CONTROL OF THE AIRCRAFT AT 250 FEET ABOVE GROUND LEVEL AND WAS UNABLE TO CONTROL THE AIRCRAFT DUE TO A POSSIBLE FLIGHT CONTROL MALFUNCTION. PILOT STATEMENTS WERE CONFLICTING REGARDING WHY AND HOW THE FLIGHT CONTROLS WERE TRANSFERRED.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.