20071216831749I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Gulstm 114-B · Gainesville, FL · December 16, 2007

Date
December 16, 2007 · 16:00 local
Place
Gainesville, FL
Airport
Gainesville Regional
Phase of flight
Practice Training Manuevers
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N529VM
Reported as
Gulstm 114B
Reported engine
Lycoming IO540*
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
558 total233 in this make and model35 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) While performing a 180 degree approach and landing during a commercial pilot airplane single engine land practical test, applicant allowed aircraft's rate of descent to increase on short final. Applicant applied power to recover but aircraft landed hard in a high nose up attitude, resulting in a tail strike and subsequent minor damage to the aircraft's fiberglass tailcone. The applicant was issued a notice of disapproval by pilot examiner privacy data omitted and examiner privacy data omitted was counseled regarding failure to intervene quickly enough to prevent the tail strike.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) WHILE PERFORMING A 180 DEGREE APPROACH AND LANDING DURING A COMMERCIAL PILOT AIRPLANE SINGLE ENGINE LAND PRACTICAL TEST, APPLICANT ALLOWED AIRCRAFT'S RATE OF DESCENT TO INCREASE ON SHORT FINAL. APPLICANT APPLIED POWER TO RECOVER BUT AIRCRAFT LANDED HARD IN A HIGH NOSE UP ATTITUDE, RESULTING IN A TAIL STRIKE AND SUBSEQUENT MINOR DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT'S FIBERGLASS TAILCONE. THE APPLICANT WAS ISSUED A NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL BY PILOT EXAMINER ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ AND EXAMINER ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ WAS COUNSELED REGARDING FAILURE TO INTERVENE QUICKLY ENOUGH TO PREVENT THE TAIL STRIKE.