What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) The pilot in command stated that he made a normal landing at igm with the gear down and a three green light indication on the panel. The PIC further stated that after the landing touchdown, and during the rollout/deceleration, the nose gear collapsed resulting in minor damage to the aircraft. No injuries to the occupants were reported. Note: airworthiness inspector privacy data omitted inspected this aircraft and noted in his included statement that the cause of this incident was not likely due to a failure of the nose gear rear brace assembly. AD 72-22-01 would not apply in this incident as it applied to the main gear up-lock rollers only. Further investigation of this failure is pending the removal of this failed component.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) THE PILOT IN COMMAND STATED THAT HE MADE A NORMAL LANDING AT IGM WITH THE GEAR DOWN AND A THREE GREEN LIGHT INDICATION ON THE PANEL. THE PIC FURTHER STATED THAT AFTER THE LANDING TOUCHDOWN, AND DURING THE ROLLOUT/DECELERATION, THE NOSE GEAR COLLAPSED RESULTING IN MINOR DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT. NO INJURIES TO THE OCCUPANTS WERE REPORTED. NOTE: AIRWORTHINESS INSPECTOR ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ INSPECTED THIS AIRCRAFT AND NOTED IN HIS INCLUDED STATEMENT THAT THE CAUSE OF THIS INCIDENT WAS NOT LIKELY DUE TO A FAILURE OF THE NOSE GEAR REAR BRACE ASSEMBLY. AD 72-22-01 WOULD NOT APPLY IN THIS INCIDENT AS IT APPLIED TO THE MAIN GEAR UP-LOCK ROLLERS ONLY. FURTHER INVESTIGATION OF THIS FAILURE IS PENDING THE REMOVAL OF THIS FAILED COMPONENT.