20080226836369A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Beech A36 · Colbert, GA · February 26, 2008

Date
February 26, 2008 · 16:22 local
Place
Colbert, GA
Phase of flight
Normal Cruise
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N623CQ
NTSB investigation
NTSBNYC08LA112
Reported as
Beech A36
Reported engine
Continental IO550B
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
420 total0 in this make and model0 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) Propeller tear down analysis revealed that the rear bushing, through which the propeller pitch control rod passed, which is part of a rear hub assembly repair, was dislodged and contained within the rear of the hub. The adhesive that was placed on the rear bushing to help hold it in place in the hub assembly was found to have not adhered to the outside diameter of the bushing. Also found during the tear down analysis was that the propeller pitch control rod was loose and appeared to have not been properly torqued to the 40 PSI required. It is determined that the dislodged bushing and improperly torqued propeller pitch control rod were casual in the pilot's eventually losing control of propeller RPM. And ustimately, the loss of thrust when the propeller decreased below the designed 12 degrees pitch stop where it should have normally remained when all the oil was lost int the front portion of the propeller hub assembly. This is supported by both pilot's statements that the propeller RPM went to the max reading on the engine tachometer even with the slightest application of throttle indicating no propeller load as some would have been evident had the blade stopped at the low pitch stop of 12 degrees.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) PROPELLER TEAR DOWN ANALYSIS REVEALED THAT THE REAR BUSHING, THROUGH WHICH THE PROPELLER PITCH CONTROL ROD PASSED, WHICH IS PART OF A REAR HUB ASSEMBLY REPAIR, WAS DISLODGED AND CONTAINED WITHIN THE REAR OF THE HUB. THE ADHESIVE THAT WAS PLACED ON THE REAR BUSHING TO HELP HOLD IT IN PLACE IN THE HUB ASSEMBLY WAS FOUND TO HAVE NOT ADHERED TO THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE BUSHING. ALSO FOUND DURING THE TEAR DOWN ANALYSIS WAS THAT THE PROPELLER PITCH CONTROL ROD WAS LOOSE AND APPEARED TO HAVE NOT BEEN PROPERLY TORQUED TO THE 40 PSI REQUIRED. IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE DISLODGED BUSHING AND IMPROPERLY TORQUED PROPELLER PITCH CONTROL ROD WERE CASUAL IN THE PILOT'S EVENTUALLY LOSING CONTROL OF PROPELLER RPM. AND USTIMATELY, THE LOSS OF THRUST WHEN THE PROPELLER DECREASED BELOW THE DESIGNED 12 DEGREES PITCH STOP WHERE IT SHOULD HAVE NORMALLY REMAINED WHEN ALL THE OIL WAS LOST INT THE FRONT PORTION OF THE PROPELLER HUB ASSEMBLY. THIS IS SUPPORTED BY BOTH PILOT'S STATEMENTS THAT THE PROPELLER RPM WENT TO THE MAX READING ON THE ENGINE TACHOMETER EVEN WITH THE SLIGHTEST APPLICATION OF THROTTLE INDICATING NO PROPELLER LOAD AS SOME WOULD HAVE BEEN EVIDENT HAD THE BLADE STOPPED AT THE LOW PITCH STOP OF 12 DEGREES.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N623CQ · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.