20080303012009A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Piper PA-28-161 · Sacaton, AZ · March 3, 2008

Date
March 3, 2008 · 08:30 local
Place
Sacaton, AZ
Phase of flight
Sfl Final Approach
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N8400A
NTSB investigation
NTSBSEA08LA085
Reported as
Piper PA28161
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
695 total500 in this make and model180 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) On site visual inspection by sdl FSDO inspector conducted. Pictures were taken and original statements collected from both on board flight instructor and student. Consistent accounts of the incident from both airmen indicated a simulated engine failure was initiated at approximately 1500 feet AGL. Intended landing target was a plowed field unsuitable for an actual landing. Statements indicate that the intended landing target at east end of the field was not going to be achieved without utilizing full flaps and forward slip. At approximately 100 feet AGL, the flight instructor advised the student to "go around." The student moved the throttle forward, however not to the full forward position. The instructor then reacted by placing the throttle full forward just prior to the aircraft contacting the ground. During the post accident inspection, the engine was run without incident. Both magnetos were tested and considered operational.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) ON SITE VISUAL INSPECTION BY SDL FSDO INSPECTOR CONDUCTED. PICTURES WERE TAKEN AND ORIGINAL STATEMENTS COLLECTED FROM BOTH ON BOARD FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR AND STUDENT. CONSISTENT ACCOUNTS OF THE INCIDENT FROM BOTH AIRMEN INDICATED A SIMULATED ENGINE FAILURE WAS INITIATED AT APPROXIMATELY 1500 FEET AGL. INTENDED LANDING TARGET WAS A PLOWED FIELD UNSUITABLE FOR AN ACTUAL LANDING. STATEMENTS INDICATE THAT THE INTENDED LANDING TARGET AT EAST END OF THE FIELD WAS NOT GOING TO BE ACHIEVED WITHOUT UTILIZING FULL FLAPS AND FORWARD SLIP. AT APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET AGL, THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR ADVISED THE STUDENT TO "GO AROUND." THE STUDENT MOVED THE THROTTLE FORWARD, HOWEVER NOT TO THE FULL FORWARD POSITION. THE INSTRUCTOR THEN REACTED BY PLACING THE THROTTLE FULL FORWARD JUST PRIOR TO THE AIRCRAFT CONTACTING THE GROUND. DURING THE POST ACCIDENT INSPECTION, THE ENGINE WAS RUN WITHOUT INCIDENT. BOTH MAGNETOS WERE TESTED AND CONSIDERED OPERATIONAL.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N8400A · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.