What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) Pilot privacy data omitted landed his Cessna 182 N1389B on a clearly marked closed runway at Worland, Wyoming. He stated it was an emergency because he "had to pee". He departed missoula, Montana with casper, Wyoming as his intended destination. He had not checked NOTAMS for Worland because he had no intention to land there. He stated that the lights on the bar across the closed runway were not visible until short final, at which point he first realized the runway might be closed. He also had been speaking with the UNICOM operator on the radio, who mentioned the workers and closed taxiways, but never stated the runway was closed. At the time privacy data omitted actually landed, he observed that there no obstructions on the runway itself and deemed that a safe landing could be made.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) PILOT ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ LANDED HIS CESSNA 182 N1389B ON A CLEARLY MARKED CLOSED RUNWAY AT WORLAND, WYOMING. HE STATED IT WAS AN EMERGENCY BECAUSE HE "HAD TO PEE". HE DEPARTED MISSOULA, MONTANA WITH CASPER, WYOMING AS HIS INTENDED DESTINATION. HE HAD NOT CHECKED NOTAMS FOR WORLAND BECAUSE HE HAD NO INTENTION TO LAND THERE. HE STATED THAT THE LIGHTS ON THE BAR ACROSS THE CLOSED RUNWAY WERE NOT VISIBLE UNTIL SHORT FINAL, AT WHICH POINT HE FIRST REALIZED THE RUNWAY MIGHT BE CLOSED. HE ALSO HAD BEEN SPEAKING WITH THE UNICOM OPERATOR ON THE RADIO, WHO MENTIONED THE WORKERS AND CLOSED TAXIWAYS, BUT NEVER STATED THE RUNWAY WAS CLOSED. AT THE TIME ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ ACTUALLY LANDED, HE OBSERVED THAT THERE NO OBSTRUCTIONS ON THE RUNWAY ITSELF AND DEEMED THAT A SAFE LANDING COULD BE MADE.