20081119851329I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Cessna 320D · Houston, TX · November 19, 2008

Date
November 19, 2008 · 09:20 local
Place
Houston, TX
Airport
Lone Star Executive
Phase of flight
Landing
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N120GC
Reported as
Cessna 320D
Reported engine
Continental GTSIO520C
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
965 total214 in this make and model6 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) On 11/19/2008, N120GC, CE-320D, landed gear up. Pilot reported that he experienced an electrical failure, tried to extend gear manually but had no indication that the gear was down. He did not do a "fly by" because of very erratic radio transmissions. The pilot stated that he removed both fuses from the alternator system. The fuses were not replaced for this flight. Our investigation revealed there was no indication that the landing gear was extended prior to landing. The gear doors had no damage and the tires had no scuff marks from side load. There were scratches to the underside. Both propellers had ground blades as a result of sliding on impact. The mechanics stated that this was the second flight after the annual inspection.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) ON 11/19/2008, N120GC, CE-320D, LANDED GEAR UP. PILOT REPORTED THAT HE EXPERIENCED AN ELECTRICAL FAILURE, TRIED TO EXTEND GEAR MANUALLY BUT HAD NO INDICATION THAT THE GEAR WAS DOWN. HE DID NOT DO A "FLY BY" BECAUSE OF VERY ERRATIC RADIO TRANSMISSIONS. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE REMOVED BOTH FUSES FROM THE ALTERNATOR SYSTEM. THE FUSES WERE NOT REPLACED FOR THIS FLIGHT. OUR INVESTIGATION REVEALED THERE WAS NO INDICATION THAT THE LANDING GEAR WAS EXTENDED PRIOR TO LANDING. THE GEAR DOORS HAD NO DAMAGE AND THE TIRES HAD NO SCUFF MARKS FROM SIDE LOAD. THERE WERE SCRATCHES TO THE UNDERSIDE. BOTH PROPELLERS HAD GROUND BLADES AS A RESULT OF SLIDING ON IMPACT. THE MECHANICS STATED THAT THIS WAS THE SECOND FLIGHT AFTER THE ANNUAL INSPECTION.

Other reports on N120GC · 2

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.