20090224004379A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Lear 35A · Kansas City, MO · February 24, 2009

Date
February 24, 2009 · 06:06 local
Place
Kansas City, MO
Airport
Charles B. Wheeler Downtown
Phase of flight
Landing
Operating rules
Air taxi and commuter (Part 135)
Operator
BKAA
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N465NW
NTSB investigation
NTSBCEN09CA175
Reported as
Lear 35A
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
3,450 total550 in this make and model100 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(-23) The flying pilot (copilot) decided to change landing runways from a final approach position of about 1 mile out for runway 21 to land on runway 19. The wind was from the east at about 10 knots. The maneuver required a 90 degree right turn to the west, followed by a 110 degree left turn while descending to the touchdown zone of runway 19. As the aircraft was sinking rapidly at a low speed and drifting across the runway, the captain called for a go-around. The aircraft touched down on the runway, on the right wing fuel tank while go-around power was being applied. As the aircraft lifted off, it rolled to the left and struck the left wing fuel tank on the runway. The aircraft became airborne, streaming fuel from the damaged right tank, flew a visual traffic pattern and landed on runway 19 without further incident. Damage to the right wing, just inboard of the fuel tank, was substantial. Statement from the tower controllers indicate that the aircraft was not on a stabilized approach and was still maneuvering as it crossed the end of runway 19 and began its landing flare.

As the FAA filed it

(-23) THE FLYING PILOT (COPILOT) DECIDED TO CHANGE LANDING RUNWAYS FROM A FINAL APPROACH POSITION OF ABOUT 1 MILE OUT FOR RUNWAY 21 TO LAND ON RUNWAY 19. THE WIND WAS FROM THE EAST AT ABOUT 10 KNOTS. THE MANEUVER REQUIRED A 90 DEGREE RIGHT TURN TO THE WEST, FOLLOWED BY A 110 DEGREE LEFT TURN WHILE DESCENDING TO THE TOUCHDOWN ZONE OF RUNWAY 19. AS THE AIRCRAFT WAS SINKING RAPIDLY AT A LOW SPEED AND DRIFTING ACROSS THE RUNWAY, THE CAPTAIN CALLED FOR A GO-AROUND. THE AIRCRAFT TOUCHED DOWN ON THE RUNWAY, ON THE RIGHT WING FUEL TANK WHILE GO-AROUND POWER WAS BEING APPLIED. AS THE AIRCRAFT LIFTED OFF, IT ROLLED TO THE LEFT AND STRUCK THE LEFT WING FUEL TANK ON THE RUNWAY. THE AIRCRAFT BECAME AIRBORNE, STREAMING FUEL FROM THE DAMAGED RIGHT TANK, FLEW A VISUAL TRAFFIC PATTERN AND LANDED ON RUNWAY 19 WITHOUT FURTHER INCIDENT. DAMAGE TO THE RIGHT WING, JUST INBOARD OF THE FUEL TANK, WAS SUBSTANTIAL. STATEMENT FROM THE TOWER CONTROLLERS INDICATE THAT THE AIRCRAFT WAS NOT ON A STABILIZED APPROACH AND WAS STILL MANEUVERING AS IT CROSSED THE END OF RUNWAY 19 AND BEGAN ITS LANDING FLARE.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.