What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-23) The aircraft departed Air Sailing Gliderport enroute to cameron park, CA and returned to land after the canopy came lose. The pilot stated that on takeoff the canopy popped open, but that he was able to lock it sufficiently for a safe landing. He added that during the landing flare to runway 03, the canopy popped open again, blocking his forward view of the runway. Physical evidence indicated that the aircraft exited the right side of the runway and twisted around ending up on its nose and main gear, pointing in a northerly direction.
As the FAA filed it
(-23) THE AIRCRAFT DEPARTED AIR SAILING GLIDERPORT ENROUTE TO CAMERON PARK, CA AND RETURNED TO LAND AFTER THE CANOPY CAME LOSE. THE PILOT STATED THAT ON TAKEOFF THE CANOPY POPPED OPEN, BUT THAT HE WAS ABLE TO LOCK IT SUFFICIENTLY FOR A SAFE LANDING. HE ADDED THAT DURING THE LANDING FLARE TO RUNWAY 03, THE CANOPY POPPED OPEN AGAIN, BLOCKING HIS FORWARD VIEW OF THE RUNWAY. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE INDICATED THAT THE AIRCRAFT EXITED THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE RUNWAY AND TWISTED AROUND ENDING UP ON ITS NOSE AND MAIN GEAR, POINTING IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.