What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
The FSDO received a call from the jqf tower supervisor stating that a Mooney had porpoised on landing and the aircraft ended up on the right side of the runway in the mud. There was no damage to the aircraft, airman or runway enviroment. Permission was given to move the aircraft. The airman was told that the FAA was on the way to discuss what happened. While interviewing the airman it was discovered that due to the harsh winter in indianapolis, he had not flown in the last five months. He stated that "he landed too fast, the winds drifted him too FAR to the right and ended up with the right gear in the mud off the side of runway 2. The aircraft was inspected by the repair station at spitifre and it was determined that no damage was done to the propeller or landing gear. The aircraft had a lot of mud on it and was to be washed.
As the FAA filed it
THE FSDO RECEIVED A CALL FROM THE JQF TOWER SUPERVISOR STATING THAT A MOONEY HAD PORPOISED ON LANDING AND THE AIRCRAFT ENDED UP ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE RUNWAY IN THE MUD. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT, AIRMAN OR RUNWAY ENVIROMENT. PERMISSION WAS GIVEN TO MOVE THE AIRCRAFT. THE AIRMAN WAS TOLD THAT THE FAA WAS ON THE WAY TO DISCUSS WHAT HAPPENED. WHILE INTERVIEWING THE AIRMAN IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT DUE TO THE HARSH WINTER IN INDIANAPOLIS, HE HAD NOT FLOWN IN THE LAST FIVE MONTHS. HE STATED THAT "HE LANDED TOO FAST, THE WINDS DRIFTED HIM TOO FAR TO THE RIGHT AND ENDED UP WITH THE RIGHT GEAR IN THE MUD OFF THE SIDE OF RUNWAY 2. THE AIRCRAFT WAS INSPECTED BY THE REPAIR STATION AT SPITIFRE AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT NO DAMAGE WAS DONE TO THE PROPELLER OR LANDING GEAR. THE AIRCRAFT HAD A LOT OF MUD ON IT AND WAS TO BE WASHED.