What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
The airman was conducting aerial application of chemical to a corn field. The airman stated that during his aerial survey of the field prior to the application he had identified the electrical transmission wires he eventually struck. The airman stated he had completed application to one side of the field and started application to another section of the field on the other side of the wires. The airman made one pass and estimated his speed to be 45 KIAS when he struck and broke the top wire. The airman stated he was watching trees and the uneven sloping terrain that were also in the vicinity of the wires. After the strike,the airman determined he had control of aircraft and landed without incident in an open area of the cornfield near the wire strike site.
As the FAA filed it
THE AIRMAN WAS CONDUCTING AERIAL APPLICATION OF CHEMICAL TO A CORN FIELD. THE AIRMAN STATED THAT DURING HIS AERIAL SURVEY OF THE FIELD PRIOR TO THE APPLICATION HE HAD IDENTIFIED THE ELECTRICAL TRANSMISSION WIRES HE EVENTUALLY STRUCK. THE AIRMAN STATED HE HAD COMPLETED APPLICATION TO ONE SIDE OF THE FIELD AND STARTED APPLICATION TO ANOTHER SECTION OF THE FIELD ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WIRES. THE AIRMAN MADE ONE PASS AND ESTIMATED HIS SPEED TO BE 45 KIAS WHEN HE STRUCK AND BROKE THE TOP WIRE. THE AIRMAN STATED HE WAS WATCHING TREES AND THE UNEVEN SLOPING TERRAIN THAT WERE ALSO IN THE VICINITY OF THE WIRES. AFTER THE STRIKE,THE AIRMAN DETERMINED HE HAD CONTROL OF AIRCRAFT AND LANDED WITHOUT INCIDENT IN AN OPEN AREA OF THE CORNFIELD NEAR THE WIRE STRIKE SITE.