20130414012499A

Accident · Destroyed

FAA accident report · Quad City Ultralight Acft CHALLENGER I · Winnie, TX · April 14, 2013

Date
April 14, 2013 · 07:40 local
Place
Winnie, TX
Airport
Chambers County-Winnie Stowell
Phase of flight
Takeoff: Climb Out
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Destroyed
Aircraft
N171DP
NTSB investigation
NTSBCEN13LA227
Reported as
Quad City Ultralight Acft Challenger I
Reported engine
ROTAX 503DCSI
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
1
Pilot’s flight hours
100 total1 in this make and model20 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

The pilot had just bought a new aircraft, which was registered in the light sport category. The pilot did not hold a sport pilot certificate; however he did own and had a number of hours in a part 103 aircraft.

The part 103 aircraft the pilot owned and had his most recent experience in was different from the accident aircraft, in that it only had two different control inputs. These were the rudder and the elevator. Both of these were controlled by a control stick.

The accident aircraft had a traditional layout, where the rudder was controlled by rudder pedals and the elevator and ailerons were controlled by a stick.

The pilot received no formal training and less than one hour of flight time in a similar type of aircraft, from a friend, before attempting to fly his new aircraft.

After take off, the pilot inputted full aileron and rudder, causing the aircraft to enter a spin.

As the FAA filed it

THE PILOT HAD JUST BOUGHT A NEW AIRCRAFT, WHICH WAS REGISTERED IN THE LIGHT SPORT CATEGORY. THE PILOT DID NOT HOLD A SPORT PILOT CERTIFICATE; HOWEVER HE DID OWN AND HAD A NUMBER OF HOURS IN A PART 103 AIRCRAFT.

THE PART 103 AIRCRAFT THE PILOT OWNED AND HAD HIS MOST RECENT EXPERIENCE IN WAS DIFFERENT FROM THE ACCIDENT AIRCRAFT, IN THAT IT ONLY HAD TWO DIFFERENT CONTROL INPUTS. THESE WERE THE RUDDER AND THE ELEVATOR. BOTH OF THESE WERE CONTROLLED BY A CONTROL STICK.

THE ACCIDENT AIRCRAFT HAD A TRADITIONAL LAYOUT, WHERE THE RUDDER WAS CONTROLLED BY RUDDER PEDALS AND THE ELEVATOR AND AILERONS WERE CONTROLLED BY A STICK.

THE PILOT RECEIVED NO FORMAL TRAINING AND LESS THAN ONE HOUR OF FLIGHT TIME IN A SIMILAR TYPE OF AIRCRAFT, FROM A FRIEND, BEFORE ATTEMPTING TO FLY HIS NEW AIRCRAFT.

AFTER TAKE OFF, THE PILOT INPUTTED FULL AILERON AND RUDDER, CAUSING THE AIRCRAFT TO ENTER A SPIN.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.