20130608014939A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Eurocopter EC 130 B4 · Valle, AZ · June 8, 2013

Date
June 8, 2013 · 09:30 local
Place
Valle, AZ
Phase of flight
Other, Specify
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Operator
PG9A
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N130PH
NTSB investigation
NTSBWPR13LA266
Reported as
Eurocopter EC 130 B4
Reported engine
Turbomeca ARRIEL-2B1
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificates
Commercial pilot, flight instructor
Pilot’s flight hours
2,713 total501 in this make and model131 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

According to the company instructor he had demonstrated a simulated engine failure with an intended power recovery. This procedure involved rolling the throttle twist grip to the ground idle position. At approximately 200 feet AGL, the instructor attempted a power recovery by rolling the twist grip to the flight position. The instructor noted that the twist grip would not move and was stuck in the ground idle position. The instructor verified that the pilot under instruction was not holding the controls. As a result, a full down autorotation was performed in which substantial damage to the aircraft occurred. The damage included main rotor blade trailing edge delamination, a severed star flex arm, and separation of the fenestron assembly. No injuries or post crash fire was reported.

Post accident, both the instructor and pilot under instruction attempted to roll the twist grip to the flight idle position. According to the instructor, the twist grip would only move 1/4 of an inch and would not engage the flight idle position. The pilot under instruction stated that he was not able to roll the twist grip to the flight position even after substantial force was applied.

As the FAA filed it

ACCORDING TO THE COMPANY INSTRUCTOR HE HAD DEMONSTRATED A SIMULATED ENGINE FAILURE WITH AN INTENDED POWER RECOVERY. THIS PROCEDURE INVOLVED ROLLING THE THROTTLE TWIST GRIP TO THE GROUND IDLE POSITION. AT APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET AGL, THE INSTRUCTOR ATTEMPTED A POWER RECOVERY BY ROLLING THE TWIST GRIP TO THE FLIGHT POSITION. THE INSTRUCTOR NOTED THAT THE TWIST GRIP WOULD NOT MOVE AND WAS STUCK IN THE GROUND IDLE POSITION. THE INSTRUCTOR VERIFIED THAT THE PILOT UNDER INSTRUCTION WAS NOT HOLDING THE CONTROLS. AS A RESULT, A FULL DOWN AUTOROTATION WAS PERFORMED IN WHICH SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT OCCURRED. THE DAMAGE INCLUDED MAIN ROTOR BLADE TRAILING EDGE DELAMINATION, A SEVERED STAR FLEX ARM, AND SEPARATION OF THE FENESTRON ASSEMBLY. NO INJURIES OR POST CRASH FIRE WAS REPORTED.

POST ACCIDENT, BOTH THE INSTRUCTOR AND PILOT UNDER INSTRUCTION ATTEMPTED TO ROLL THE TWIST GRIP TO THE FLIGHT IDLE POSITION. ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTOR, THE TWIST GRIP WOULD ONLY MOVE 1/4 OF AN INCH AND WOULD NOT ENGAGE THE FLIGHT IDLE POSITION. THE PILOT UNDER INSTRUCTION STATED THAT HE WAS NOT ABLE TO ROLL THE TWIST GRIP TO THE FLIGHT POSITION EVEN AFTER SUBSTANTIAL FORCE WAS APPLIED.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.