What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
The flt school operator of the acft rptd the following: the PIC was on a rental flight to kxfl for lunch with two pax. After ldg, the PIC taxied the acft to the FBO and turned on to the ramp. The rt wingtip struck the rudder trim tab of an unoccupied LR-35 (N58MM) that was parked on the ramp.
Damage to N385ER consisted of a broken nav light lens cover and scratched paint on the wing tip. Visible damage to the parked acft consisted of paint transfer marks on the trailing edge of the rudder trim tab.
The PIC was reportedly taxiing on a taxi centerline when the incident occurred. School personnel who inspected the site rptd the tail contact point on the parked acft was about 18' 2" from the centerline, and noted that there were no obstructions that would have precluded the PIC from taxiing slightly to the left of the centerline to avoid contacting the parked acft.
As the FAA filed it
THE FLT SCHOOL OPERATOR OF THE ACFT RPTD THE FOLLOWING: THE PIC WAS ON A RENTAL FLIGHT TO KXFL FOR LUNCH WITH TWO PAX. AFTER LDG, THE PIC TAXIED THE ACFT TO THE FBO AND TURNED ON TO THE RAMP. THE RT WINGTIP STRUCK THE RUDDER TRIM TAB OF AN UNOCCUPIED LR-35 (N58MM) THAT WAS PARKED ON THE RAMP.
DAMAGE TO N385ER CONSISTED OF A BROKEN NAV LIGHT LENS COVER AND SCRATCHED PAINT ON THE WING TIP. VISIBLE DAMAGE TO THE PARKED ACFT CONSISTED OF PAINT TRANSFER MARKS ON THE TRAILING EDGE OF THE RUDDER TRIM TAB.
THE PIC WAS REPORTEDLY TAXIING ON A TAXI CENTERLINE WHEN THE INCIDENT OCCURRED. SCHOOL PERSONNEL WHO INSPECTED THE SITE RPTD THE TAIL CONTACT POINT ON THE PARKED ACFT WAS ABOUT 18' 2" FROM THE CENTERLINE, AND NOTED THAT THERE WERE NO OBSTRUCTIONS THAT WOULD HAVE PRECLUDED THE PIC FROM TAXIING SLIGHTLY TO THE LEFT OF THE CENTERLINE TO AVOID CONTACTING THE PARKED ACFT.