20131027020659I

Incident · No damage

FAA incident report · Cessna 182C · Boulder, CO · October 27, 2013

Date
October 27, 2013 · 13:30 local
Place
Boulder, CO
Airport
Boulder Municipal Airport
Phase of flight
Cruise/Level Flight
Operating rules
Parachute jumping (Part 105)
Damage
No damage
Aircraft
N100SD
Reported as
Cessna 182C
Reported engine
Continental O-470 series
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
1

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

On 10/27/2013 privacy data omitted conducted her 3rd solo skydive with independent skydive company of Boulder Colorado. Upon exiting the aircraft her main parachute deployed, after grabbing the steering toggles and inspecting the canopy, she believed a malfunctioned occurred because ?it appeared to be too small?. She followed the emergency procedure by pulling the reserve static line (rsl) handle which releases the main canopy then deploys the reserve canopy. When the rsl handle was pulled, it released one side of the main canopy risers but not the other. privacy data omitted Entered a spiral accelerated decent. Realizing the main parachute did not fully detach and the reserve parachute had not deployed, she then pulled on the reserve deployment handle. Due to the spiraling decent and low altitude she contacted the ground prior to the reserve parachute fully deploying.

Witnesses on the ground stated the main canopy was fully deployed and appeared to be functioning correctly. privacy data omitted Jump instructor who assisted her out of the aircraft stated ?her chute opened immediately and it was uneventful?.

The parachute assembly was inspected by FAA inspectors and a local FAA designated parachute rigger examiner (dpre). Specific attention was focused on the rigging of the rsl system. Per the manufactures instructions the rsl cables are set at different lengths to insure proper departure of the main canopy prior to the reserve parachute deploying (one side departs just prior to the side attached to the reserve parachute). Detailed inspection of the parachute assembly found no anomalies and everything within manufactures specifications.

In conclusion of the investigation it appears the jumper did not fully pull out the rsl handle, causing one side of the main parachute to be released and not the other. This caused a partial canopy collapse and the spiral effect for the jumper. Since the side that did not detach had the rsl the reserve parachute did not deploy. No regulatory violations found, case closed.

As the FAA filed it

ON 10/27/2013 ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ CONDUCTED HER 3RD SOLO SKYDIVE WITH INDEPENDENT SKYDIVE COMPANY OF BOULDER COLORADO. UPON EXITING THE AIRCRAFT HER MAIN PARACHUTE DEPLOYED, AFTER GRABBING THE STEERING TOGGLES AND INSPECTING THE CANOPY, SHE BELIEVED A MALFUNCTIONED OCCURRED BECAUSE ?IT APPEARED TO BE TOO SMALL?. SHE FOLLOWED THE EMERGENCY PROCEDURE BY PULLING THE RESERVE STATIC LINE (RSL) HANDLE WHICH RELEASES THE MAIN CANOPY THEN DEPLOYS THE RESERVE CANOPY. WHEN THE RSL HANDLE WAS PULLED, IT RELEASED ONE SIDE OF THE MAIN CANOPY RISERS BUT NOT THE OTHER. ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ ENTERED A SPIRAL ACCELERATED DECENT. REALIZING THE MAIN PARACHUTE DID NOT FULLY DETACH AND THE RESERVE PARACHUTE HAD NOT DEPLOYED, SHE THEN PULLED ON THE RESERVE DEPLOYMENT HANDLE. DUE TO THE SPIRALING DECENT AND LOW ALTITUDE SHE CONTACTED THE GROUND PRIOR TO THE RESERVE PARACHUTE FULLY DEPLOYING.

WITNESSES ON THE GROUND STATED THE MAIN CANOPY WAS FULLY DEPLOYED AND APPEARED TO BE FUNCTIONING CORRECTLY. ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ JUMP INSTRUCTOR WHO ASSISTED HER OUT OF THE AIRCRAFT STATED ?HER CHUTE OPENED IMMEDIATELY AND IT WAS UNEVENTFUL?.

THE PARACHUTE ASSEMBLY WAS INSPECTED BY FAA INSPECTORS AND A LOCAL FAA DESIGNATED PARACHUTE RIGGER EXAMINER (DPRE). SPECIFIC ATTENTION WAS FOCUSED ON THE RIGGING OF THE RSL SYSTEM. PER THE MANUFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS THE RSL CABLES ARE SET AT DIFFERENT LENGTHS TO INSURE PROPER DEPARTURE OF THE MAIN CANOPY PRIOR TO THE RESERVE PARACHUTE DEPLOYING (ONE SIDE DEPARTS JUST PRIOR TO THE SIDE ATTACHED TO THE RESERVE PARACHUTE). DETAILED INSPECTION OF THE PARACHUTE ASSEMBLY FOUND NO ANOMALIES AND EVERYTHING WITHIN MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS.

IN CONCLUSION OF THE INVESTIGATION IT APPEARS THE JUMPER DID NOT FULLY PULL OUT THE RSL HANDLE, CAUSING ONE SIDE OF THE MAIN PARACHUTE TO BE RELEASED AND NOT THE OTHER. THIS CAUSED A PARTIAL CANOPY COLLAPSE AND THE SPIRAL EFFECT FOR THE JUMPER. SINCE THE SIDE THAT DID NOT DETACH HAD THE RSL THE RESERVE PARACHUTE DID NOT DEPLOY. NO REGULATORY VIOLATIONS FOUND, CASE CLOSED.

Other reports on N100SD · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.