What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
On July 21, 2014, at approximately 3:45 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 150D, N4545U, sustained substantial damage following impact with the ground when it exited the side of the runway, flipped over, and came to rest, upside-down. The student pilot occupant was not injured and there were no passengers on board. The airplane was registered to R2 aviation LLC of Greenfield, Indiana and was being operated under the provisions of 14 code of federal regulations part 91. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed.
The student pilot stated that he was conducting a local solo under the supervision of his flight instructor. He was practicing stop and go takeoffs and landings in the traffic pattern for runway two-five. The calculated crosswind component for runway 25, based on the reported winds, was 4 knots from the left. The student pilot stated that the aircraft drifted left, away from the centerline after landing. He compensated by adding rudder with the intention of returning the aircraft to the centerline. However, he stated that he pushed the left rudder pedal instead of the right rudder pedal.
A visual examination of the runway area revealed skid marks indicating the left main contacted first. The right main contacted the runway 13.5 feet after the left main wheel. The skid marks continue to the edge of runway where the concrete ends. Tire impressions begin where the sod meets the runway. The impressions continued to 35 feet and a 45 degree angle from the runway.
As the FAA filed it
ON JULY 21, 2014, AT APPROXIMATELY 3:45 EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME, A CESSNA 150D, N4545U, SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE FOLLOWING IMPACT WITH THE GROUND WHEN IT EXITED THE SIDE OF THE RUNWAY, FLIPPED OVER, AND CAME TO REST, UPSIDE-DOWN. THE STUDENT PILOT OCCUPANT WAS NOT INJURED AND THERE WERE NO PASSENGERS ON BOARD. THE AIRPLANE WAS REGISTERED TO R2 AVIATION LLC OF GREENFIELD, INDIANA AND WAS BEING OPERATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF 14 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART 91. VISUAL METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS PREVAILED.
THE STUDENT PILOT STATED THAT HE WAS CONDUCTING A LOCAL SOLO UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF HIS FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR. HE WAS PRACTICING STOP AND GO TAKEOFFS AND LANDINGS IN THE TRAFFIC PATTERN FOR RUNWAY TWO-FIVE. THE CALCULATED CROSSWIND COMPONENT FOR RUNWAY 25, BASED ON THE REPORTED WINDS, WAS 4 KNOTS FROM THE LEFT. THE STUDENT PILOT STATED THAT THE AIRCRAFT DRIFTED LEFT, AWAY FROM THE CENTERLINE AFTER LANDING. HE COMPENSATED BY ADDING RUDDER WITH THE INTENTION OF RETURNING THE AIRCRAFT TO THE CENTERLINE. HOWEVER, HE STATED THAT HE PUSHED THE LEFT RUDDER PEDAL INSTEAD OF THE RIGHT RUDDER PEDAL.
A VISUAL EXAMINATION OF THE RUNWAY AREA REVEALED SKID MARKS INDICATING THE LEFT MAIN CONTACTED FIRST. THE RIGHT MAIN CONTACTED THE RUNWAY 13.5 FEET AFTER THE LEFT MAIN WHEEL. THE SKID MARKS CONTINUE TO THE EDGE OF RUNWAY WHERE THE CONCRETE ENDS. TIRE IMPRESSIONS BEGIN WHERE THE SOD MEETS THE RUNWAY. THE IMPRESSIONS CONTINUED TO 35 FEET AND A 45 DEGREE ANGLE FROM THE RUNWAY.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N4545U · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.