20151024022649A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Luscombe 8A · Prescott, AZ · October 24, 2015

Date
October 24, 2015 · 14:58 local
Place
Prescott, AZ
Airport
Ernest A. Love Field
Phase of flight
Landing: Rollout
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N25100
NTSB investigation
NTSBWPR16LA017
Reported as
Luscombe 8A
Reported engine
Continental C-85-12
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificates
Commercial pilot, flight instructor
Pilot’s flight hours
11,000 total200 in this make and model11 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

The pilot had just earlier purchased N25100 and was operating it as a sport aircraft. Pilot states that the landing on runway 21L at prc was normal and during the rollout at a slow speed the aircraft began to turn to the left. He began to apply right rudder to compensate, but the left turn increased. With full right rudder applied the aircraft then turned sharply left and began skidding sideways. Pilot states that he did not apply any breaks. The right main landing gear tubular structure bent under the load and folded inward and under the fuselage and the right wing dropped, making contact with the runway. This resulted in structural damage to the right wing, wing tip, and aileron. The aircraft was relocated to a hangar.

An examination of the aircraft revealed that there was looseness of the leaf spring where it attaches to the tail section and play in the tail wheel pivot mechanism. Unable to determine if the looseness of the tail wheel assembly caused the aircraft to lose control on the rollout, but it may have been a contributing factor. Prior to flying to Prescott, AZ, the pilot landed the aircraft in gallop, new Mexico (gup). He said that during the landing rollout in gup, he noted that the steering felt loose, but did not experience any serious control issues.

The last annual inspection on this aircraft was in November 04, 2014 and had flown 22.4 hours since the inspection.

The pilot has owned and operated 2 aircraft of the same make/model as the accident aircraft in the past and has approximately 200 hours in tail wheeled aircraft.

As the FAA filed it

THE PILOT HAD JUST EARLIER PURCHASED N25100 AND WAS OPERATING IT AS A SPORT AIRCRAFT. PILOT STATES THAT THE LANDING ON RUNWAY 21L AT PRC WAS NORMAL AND DURING THE ROLLOUT AT A SLOW SPEED THE AIRCRAFT BEGAN TO TURN TO THE LEFT. HE BEGAN TO APPLY RIGHT RUDDER TO COMPENSATE, BUT THE LEFT TURN INCREASED. WITH FULL RIGHT RUDDER APPLIED THE AIRCRAFT THEN TURNED SHARPLY LEFT AND BEGAN SKIDDING SIDEWAYS. PILOT STATES THAT HE DID NOT APPLY ANY BREAKS. THE RIGHT MAIN LANDING GEAR TUBULAR STRUCTURE BENT UNDER THE LOAD AND FOLDED INWARD AND UNDER THE FUSELAGE AND THE RIGHT WING DROPPED, MAKING CONTACT WITH THE RUNWAY. THIS RESULTED IN STRUCTURAL DAMAGE TO THE RIGHT WING, WING TIP, AND AILERON. THE AIRCRAFT WAS RELOCATED TO A HANGAR.

AN EXAMINATION OF THE AIRCRAFT REVEALED THAT THERE WAS LOOSENESS OF THE LEAF SPRING WHERE IT ATTACHES TO THE TAIL SECTION AND PLAY IN THE TAIL WHEEL PIVOT MECHANISM. UNABLE TO DETERMINE IF THE LOOSENESS OF THE TAIL WHEEL ASSEMBLY CAUSED THE AIRCRAFT TO LOSE CONTROL ON THE ROLLOUT, BUT IT MAY HAVE BEEN A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR. PRIOR TO FLYING TO PRESCOTT, AZ, THE PILOT LANDED THE AIRCRAFT IN GALLOP, NEW MEXICO (GUP). HE SAID THAT DURING THE LANDING ROLLOUT IN GUP, HE NOTED THAT THE STEERING FELT LOOSE, BUT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY SERIOUS CONTROL ISSUES.

THE LAST ANNUAL INSPECTION ON THIS AIRCRAFT WAS IN NOVEMBER 04, 2014 AND HAD FLOWN 22.4 HOURS SINCE THE INSPECTION.

THE PILOT HAS OWNED AND OPERATED 2 AIRCRAFT OF THE SAME MAKE/MODEL AS THE ACCIDENT AIRCRAFT IN THE PAST AND HAS APPROXIMATELY 200 HOURS IN TAIL WHEELED AIRCRAFT.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N25100 · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.