What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
PIC and sole occupant, privacy data omitted, stated that he flew a normal pattern to landing, at the Linden Airport, with his checklist displayed on his kneeboard. He stated that he may have been distracted from completing his before landing checklist during the approach to landing. He did not recall being distracted or hearing the landing gear warning horn during the approach to landing. He does believe that this system was working. His failure to extend the landing gear prior to touchdown did result in the aircraft landing on the runway in a gear-up configuration. This resulted in minor damage to the aircraft. There was no damage to other property and no reported injuries.
As the FAA filed it
PIC AND SOLE OCCUPANT, ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^, STATED THAT HE FLEW A NORMAL PATTERN TO LANDING, AT THE LINDEN AIRPORT, WITH HIS CHECKLIST DISPLAYED ON HIS KNEEBOARD. HE STATED THAT HE MAY HAVE BEEN DISTRACTED FROM COMPLETING HIS BEFORE LANDING CHECKLIST DURING THE APPROACH TO LANDING. HE DID NOT RECALL BEING DISTRACTED OR HEARING THE LANDING GEAR WARNING HORN DURING THE APPROACH TO LANDING. HE DOES BELIEVE THAT THIS SYSTEM WAS WORKING. HIS FAILURE TO EXTEND THE LANDING GEAR PRIOR TO TOUCHDOWN DID RESULT IN THE AIRCRAFT LANDING ON THE RUNWAY IN A GEAR-UP CONFIGURATION. THIS RESULTED IN MINOR DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO OTHER PROPERTY AND NO REPORTED INJURIES.
Other reports on N2201 · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.