What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
^Mr. Roberto peon-castenllanos^, who was the pilot in command, stated that he cancelled his IFR flight plan into kmgj and then entered the uncontrolled airport traffic pattern in VFR conditions. He stated that normally he extends the landing gear at midfield downwind followed by a gumps check on final approach. On this flight, he was distracted on both occasions by an aircraft announcing its entrance into the traffic pattern and also a proximity warning from his ADS-B equipment. Due to the gusty winds, he used the approach flap setting and did not hear the gear warning horn until the power was fully retarded and it was too late. The pilot in command's failure to extend the landing gear prior to touchdown resulted in the aircraft landing on the runway in a gear-up configuration resulting in minor damage to the aircraft.
As the FAA filed it
^MR. ROBERTO PEON-CASTENLLANOS^, WHO WAS THE PILOT IN COMMAND, STATED THAT HE CANCELLED HIS IFR FLIGHT PLAN INTO KMGJ AND THEN ENTERED THE UNCONTROLLED AIRPORT TRAFFIC PATTERN IN VFR CONDITIONS. HE STATED THAT NORMALLY HE EXTENDS THE LANDING GEAR AT MIDFIELD DOWNWIND FOLLOWED BY A GUMPS CHECK ON FINAL APPROACH. ON THIS FLIGHT, HE WAS DISTRACTED ON BOTH OCCASIONS BY AN AIRCRAFT ANNOUNCING ITS ENTRANCE INTO THE TRAFFIC PATTERN AND ALSO A PROXIMITY WARNING FROM HIS ADS-B EQUIPMENT. DUE TO THE GUSTY WINDS, HE USED THE APPROACH FLAP SETTING AND DID NOT HEAR THE GEAR WARNING HORN UNTIL THE POWER WAS FULLY RETARDED AND IT WAS TOO LATE. THE PILOT IN COMMAND'S FAILURE TO EXTEND THE LANDING GEAR PRIOR TO TOUCHDOWN RESULTED IN THE AIRCRAFT LANDING ON THE RUNWAY IN A GEAR-UP CONFIGURATION RESULTING IN MINOR DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT.