What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
On 12 February 2018 at approximately 1500 hours, N118MF, a C90 king air aircraft departed (kmfr) medford Oregon, enroute to (ksiy) Siskiyou County Airport CA. The training flight was conducted in VMC conditions.
The pic/check airman stated that he was conducting a simulated no-flap landing when the aircraft touched down without the landing gear being deployed. In the no flap configuration the crew did not receive an aural warning that the landing gear was down and failed to verbally confirm the gear was down and locked.
The aircraft contacted the runway and slid approximately 300 feet causing substantial damage to the aircraft belly skin and propellers.
The investigating inspector found both pilots to be forthcoming, cooperative, and to have a constructive and compliant attitude. A search FAA databases did not disclose any previous violations, accidents, or incident history. Both pilots stated that failure to verbally and visually confirm the landing gear position led to the accident.
The PIC and co-pilot were counseled in accordance with compliance philosophy.
As the FAA filed it
ON 12 FEBRUARY 2018 AT APPROXIMATELY 1500 HOURS, N118MF, A C90 KING AIR AIRCRAFT DEPARTED (KMFR) MEDFORD OREGON, ENROUTE TO (KSIY) SISKIYOU COUNTY AIRPORT CA. THE TRAINING FLIGHT WAS CONDUCTED IN VMC CONDITIONS.
THE PIC/CHECK AIRMAN STATED THAT HE WAS CONDUCTING A SIMULATED NO-FLAP LANDING WHEN THE AIRCRAFT TOUCHED DOWN WITHOUT THE LANDING GEAR BEING DEPLOYED. IN THE NO FLAP CONFIGURATION THE CREW DID NOT RECEIVE AN AURAL WARNING THAT THE LANDING GEAR WAS DOWN AND FAILED TO VERBALLY CONFIRM THE GEAR WAS DOWN AND LOCKED.
THE AIRCRAFT CONTACTED THE RUNWAY AND SLID APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET CAUSING SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT BELLY SKIN AND PROPELLERS.
THE INVESTIGATING INSPECTOR FOUND BOTH PILOTS TO BE FORTHCOMING, COOPERATIVE, AND TO HAVE A CONSTRUCTIVE AND COMPLIANT ATTITUDE. A SEARCH FAA DATABASES DID NOT DISCLOSE ANY PREVIOUS VIOLATIONS, ACCIDENTS, OR INCIDENT HISTORY. BOTH PILOTS STATED THAT FAILURE TO VERBALLY AND VISUALLY CONFIRM THE LANDING GEAR POSITION LED TO THE ACCIDENT.
THE PIC AND CO-PILOT WERE COUNSELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH COMPLIANCE PHILOSOPHY.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.