20180520006929I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Embraer-Empresa Brasileira De EMB-500 · Chesterfield, MO · May 20, 2018

Date
May 20, 2018 · 15:05 local
Place
Chesterfield, MO
Airport
Spirit Of St Louis
Phase of flight
Landing: Approach
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N876JC
Reported as
Embraer-Empresa Brasileira De EMB-500
Reported engine
Pratt & Whitney Canada PW617F-E
People aboard
4
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Commercial pilot
Pilot’s flight hours
3,363 total434 in this make and model40 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

While on final approach to ksus, the pilot noted a "brk fail" warning light while lowering the landing gear. The pilot notified ATC and elected to change his approach and landing to the longest runway with a landing headwind component, rwy 08R.

After landing the pilot applied the phenom 100 emergency brakes in accord with the published emergency procedures. The pilot then elected to clear the active runway and taxiied to the airplane's hangar on the airport while continuing to use the emergency brake system.

Note: the AFM states the aircraft is limited to a maximum of 6 applications of the emergency brake system.

While taxiing on the airplane's home hangar apron the pilot noted 1500 PSI pressure still indicated in the airplane hydraulic system and elected to make a taxiing 180 degree turn to facilitate unloading the airplane.

After completing the turn, the pilot attempted to stop the airplane with another application of the emergency brakes but was unable to arrest the forward motion of the airplane. The airplane rolled forward until contacting a parked suv resulting in damage to both the airplane and suv.

The collision with the suv caused damage to the airplane radome and some damage to the leading edge of the left wing. Due to the collision vehicle obstructing the operation of the passenger door, the passengers and pilot were forced to exit the airplane through the over-wing emergency exit.

As the FAA filed it

WHILE ON FINAL APPROACH TO KSUS, THE PILOT NOTED A "BRK FAIL" WARNING LIGHT WHILE LOWERING THE LANDING GEAR. THE PILOT NOTIFIED ATC AND ELECTED TO CHANGE HIS APPROACH AND LANDING TO THE LONGEST RUNWAY WITH A LANDING HEADWIND COMPONENT, RWY 08R.

AFTER LANDING THE PILOT APPLIED THE PHENOM 100 EMERGENCY BRAKES IN ACCORD WITH THE PUBLISHED EMERGENCY PROCEDURES. THE PILOT THEN ELECTED TO CLEAR THE ACTIVE RUNWAY AND TAXIIED TO THE AIRPLANE'S HANGAR ON THE AIRPORT WHILE CONTINUING TO USE THE EMERGENCY BRAKE SYSTEM.

NOTE: THE AFM STATES THE AIRCRAFT IS LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF 6 APPLICATIONS OF THE EMERGENCY BRAKE SYSTEM.

WHILE TAXIING ON THE AIRPLANE'S HOME HANGAR APRON THE PILOT NOTED 1500 PSI PRESSURE STILL INDICATED IN THE AIRPLANE HYDRAULIC SYSTEM AND ELECTED TO MAKE A TAXIING 180 DEGREE TURN TO FACILITATE UNLOADING THE AIRPLANE.

AFTER COMPLETING THE TURN, THE PILOT ATTEMPTED TO STOP THE AIRPLANE WITH ANOTHER APPLICATION OF THE EMERGENCY BRAKES BUT WAS UNABLE TO ARREST THE FORWARD MOTION OF THE AIRPLANE. THE AIRPLANE ROLLED FORWARD UNTIL CONTACTING A PARKED SUV RESULTING IN DAMAGE TO BOTH THE AIRPLANE AND SUV.

THE COLLISION WITH THE SUV CAUSED DAMAGE TO THE AIRPLANE RADOME AND SOME DAMAGE TO THE LEADING EDGE OF THE LEFT WING. DUE TO THE COLLISION VEHICLE OBSTRUCTING THE OPERATION OF THE PASSENGER DOOR, THE PASSENGERS AND PILOT WERE FORCED TO EXIT THE AIRPLANE THROUGH THE OVER-WING EMERGENCY EXIT.

Other reports on N876JC · 1

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.