20180705009129A

Accident · Destroyed

FAA accident report · Grumman Acft ENG Cor-Schweizer G-164B · Rochelle, IL · July 5, 2018

Date
July 5, 2018 · 15:50 local
Place
Rochelle, IL
Phase of flight
Takeoff: Climb Out
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Destroyed
Aircraft
N6795Q
NTSB investigation
NTSBGAA18CA401
Reported as
Grumman Acft ENG Cor-Schweizer G-164B
Reported engine
Pratt & Whitney R1340 series
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Commercial pilot
Pilot’s flight hours
843 total250 in this make and model

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

The flight was a practice flight operated under 14 CFR part 91 with water in the aircraft hopper. The pilot stated that he forgot to bring the aircraft out of "ground idle" and into "flight idle" following the engine run-up. The pilot stated that he did not recognize that the aircraft was not achieving the proper revolutions per minute (RPM) during takeoff roll. The pilot stated that after rotation, the aircraft did not accelerate enough to leave ground effect due to the ?ground idle? Setting and increased weight of the water load. The pilot stated that he should have jettisoned the load of water, switched the aircraft to ?flight idle,? And remained in ground effect in order to accelerate sufficiently. However, the pilot did not react in time before running out of available runway and stalling the aircraft at the departure end of the runway. The aircraft sustained substantial damage. The pilot, the sole occupant, was not injured. There was no post-crash fire.

As the FAA filed it

THE FLIGHT WAS A PRACTICE FLIGHT OPERATED UNDER 14 CFR PART 91 WITH WATER IN THE AIRCRAFT HOPPER. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE FORGOT TO BRING THE AIRCRAFT OUT OF "GROUND IDLE" AND INTO "FLIGHT IDLE" FOLLOWING THE ENGINE RUN-UP. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE DID NOT RECOGNIZE THAT THE AIRCRAFT WAS NOT ACHIEVING THE PROPER REVOLUTIONS PER MINUTE (RPM) DURING TAKEOFF ROLL. THE PILOT STATED THAT AFTER ROTATION, THE AIRCRAFT DID NOT ACCELERATE ENOUGH TO LEAVE GROUND EFFECT DUE TO THE ?GROUND IDLE? SETTING AND INCREASED WEIGHT OF THE WATER LOAD. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE SHOULD HAVE JETTISONED THE LOAD OF WATER, SWITCHED THE AIRCRAFT TO ?FLIGHT IDLE,? AND REMAINED IN GROUND EFFECT IN ORDER TO ACCELERATE SUFFICIENTLY. HOWEVER, THE PILOT DID NOT REACT IN TIME BEFORE RUNNING OUT OF AVAILABLE RUNWAY AND STALLING THE AIRCRAFT AT THE DEPARTURE END OF THE RUNWAY. THE AIRCRAFT SUSTAINED SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE. THE PILOT, THE SOLE OCCUPANT, WAS NOT INJURED. THERE WAS NO POST-CRASH FIRE.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.

Other reports on N6795Q · 2

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.