What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
The student pilot was interviewed via telephone. The student pilot is the owner of the aircraft involved. The student pilot and his instructor pilot were conducting crosswing landing training when this incident occured. The student states that one landing had been accomplished with no incident. A second landing was attempted. Upon landing the aricraft was between the runway centerline and the runway right edge. He felt as if the aicraft was going to run off of the right side of the runway. He input left rudder to correct the aircraft's position. In doing so the student pilot overcorrected the aircraft. The nose landing gerar and the left main landing departed the runway on the left side. The student pilot corrected the aircraft position back onto the runway. The aircraft was taxied to the ramp. A physical inspection was conducted and it was noted that the propeller was damaged on both blade tips. The propeller was removed for maintenance. Upon inspection of the runway lights it was noted that one light lens was broken. Database research was conducted and no previous events were noted involving the student pilot.
A telephone inteview was conducted with the instructor pilot. He confirmed in his own words that the student pilot overcorrected the aircaft upon landing causing the aircraft to depart the runway. He also confirmed the damage to the propeller blade tips and the runway light.
As the FAA filed it
THE STUDENT PILOT WAS INTERVIEWED VIA TELEPHONE. THE STUDENT PILOT IS THE OWNER OF THE AIRCRAFT INVOLVED. THE STUDENT PILOT AND HIS INSTRUCTOR PILOT WERE CONDUCTING CROSSWING LANDING TRAINING WHEN THIS INCIDENT OCCURED. THE STUDENT STATES THAT ONE LANDING HAD BEEN ACCOMPLISHED WITH NO INCIDENT. A SECOND LANDING WAS ATTEMPTED. UPON LANDING THE ARICRAFT WAS BETWEEN THE RUNWAY CENTERLINE AND THE RUNWAY RIGHT EDGE. HE FELT AS IF THE AICRAFT WAS GOING TO RUN OFF OF THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE RUNWAY. HE INPUT LEFT RUDDER TO CORRECT THE AIRCRAFT'S POSITION. IN DOING SO THE STUDENT PILOT OVERCORRECTED THE AIRCRAFT. THE NOSE LANDING GERAR AND THE LEFT MAIN LANDING DEPARTED THE RUNWAY ON THE LEFT SIDE. THE STUDENT PILOT CORRECTED THE AIRCRAFT POSITION BACK ONTO THE RUNWAY. THE AIRCRAFT WAS TAXIED TO THE RAMP. A PHYSICAL INSPECTION WAS CONDUCTED AND IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PROPELLER WAS DAMAGED ON BOTH BLADE TIPS. THE PROPELLER WAS REMOVED FOR MAINTENANCE. UPON INSPECTION OF THE RUNWAY LIGHTS IT WAS NOTED THAT ONE LIGHT LENS WAS BROKEN. DATABASE RESEARCH WAS CONDUCTED AND NO PREVIOUS EVENTS WERE NOTED INVOLVING THE STUDENT PILOT.
A TELEPHONE INTEVIEW WAS CONDUCTED WITH THE INSTRUCTOR PILOT. HE CONFIRMED IN HIS OWN WORDS THAT THE STUDENT PILOT OVERCORRECTED THE AIRCAFT UPON LANDING CAUSING THE AIRCRAFT TO DEPART THE RUNWAY. HE ALSO CONFIRMED THE DAMAGE TO THE PROPELLER BLADE TIPS AND THE RUNWAY LIGHT.
Other reports on N6949E · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.