What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
The pilot stated that a main landing gear unsafe condition was indicated after extending the leading gear on approach. Emergency landing gear extension procedures were accomplished but were unsuccessful in extending the main landing gear. The aircraft landed with the main landing gear retracted and the nose landing gear extended. There were no injuries and the aircraft received minor damage. Maintenance personnel, who inspected the aircraft after the incident, stated that the control rod connecting the hydraulic actuator to the main landing gear extension mechanism was disconnected due to an apparent failure of the attaching hardware.
As the FAA filed it
THE PILOT STATED THAT A MAIN LANDING GEAR UNSAFE CONDITION WAS INDICATED AFTER EXTENDING THE LEADING GEAR ON APPROACH. EMERGENCY LANDING GEAR EXTENSION PROCEDURES WERE ACCOMPLISHED BUT WERE UNSUCCESSFUL IN EXTENDING THE MAIN LANDING GEAR. THE AIRCRAFT LANDED WITH THE MAIN LANDING GEAR RETRACTED AND THE NOSE LANDING GEAR EXTENDED. THERE WERE NO INJURIES AND THE AIRCRAFT RECEIVED MINOR DAMAGE. MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL, WHO INSPECTED THE AIRCRAFT AFTER THE INCIDENT, STATED THAT THE CONTROL ROD CONNECTING THE HYDRAULIC ACTUATOR TO THE MAIN LANDING GEAR EXTENSION MECHANISM WAS DISCONNECTED DUE TO AN APPARENT FAILURE OF THE ATTACHING HARDWARE.