20190720023852I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Boeing 737-7H4 · Nashville, TN · July 20, 2019

Date
July 20, 2019 · 21:12 local
Place
Nashville, TN
Airport
Nashville Int'L Airport
Phase of flight
Ground/Ramp/Ma
Operating rules
Air carrier (Part 121)
Operator
SWAA
Collision
Collision on the ground
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N243WN
Reported as
Boeing 737-7H4
Reported engine
CFM International CFM56-7B24
People aboard
137
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Airline transport
Pilot’s flight hours
12,817 total12,817 in this make and model143 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Related report A-SW-29-19-007;

The captain stated; ""the airplane of gate 13 had stopped for a while and there was no indication from any ground personnel that there was a clearance problem. I made the assumption that the airplane had been positioned to give us enough clearance to turn away from it as it usually is the case."

The pilot of N243WN was unaware the wingtips overlapped with gate-13-airplane (connected to the tug off gate 13), thus begin to taxi unaware there was inadequate clearances to avoid ground collision. The wingwalker (person closest to the collision point) was also a new employee (hired within past year) and was unsuccessful gaining captain's attention once he became aware of inadequate clearance (pending collision). The company investigation is ongoing and there are pending company recommendations to avoid future similar events. There were no gate restrictions for simultaneous pushing involving gates 13 & 14.

Investigation revealed the risks associated with the pushback procedures, at bna, were acceptable, considering; one hazard was identified regarding a guide agent not being able to communicate to the same effectiviness as when headset are worn. Data did not support a hazzard of using headsets during condition (code) yellow. Corrective action of allowing headsets during condition (code) yellow was briefed and approved by the company. Implementation is contingent on rollout of new wireless headset system.

Company will follow-up with cmo once the implementation (rollout of new wireless headset system) is completed.

As the FAA filed it

RELATED REPORT A-SW-29-19-007;

THE CAPTAIN STATED; ""THE AIRPLANE OF GATE 13 HAD STOPPED FOR A WHILE AND THERE WAS NO INDICATION FROM ANY GROUND PERSONNEL THAT THERE WAS A CLEARANCE PROBLEM. I MADE THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE AIRPLANE HAD BEEN POSITIONED TO GIVE US ENOUGH CLEARANCE TO TURN AWAY FROM IT AS IT USUALLY IS THE CASE."

THE PILOT OF N243WN WAS UNAWARE THE WINGTIPS OVERLAPPED WITH GATE-13-AIRPLANE (CONNECTED TO THE TUG OFF GATE 13), THUS BEGIN TO TAXI UNAWARE THERE WAS INADEQUATE CLEARANCES TO AVOID GROUND COLLISION. THE WINGWALKER (PERSON CLOSEST TO THE COLLISION POINT) WAS ALSO A NEW EMPLOYEE (HIRED WITHIN PAST YEAR) AND WAS UNSUCCESSFUL GAINING CAPTAIN'S ATTENTION ONCE HE BECAME AWARE OF INADEQUATE CLEARANCE (PENDING COLLISION). THE COMPANY INVESTIGATION IS ONGOING AND THERE ARE PENDING COMPANY RECOMMENDATIONS TO AVOID FUTURE SIMILAR EVENTS. THERE WERE NO GATE RESTRICTIONS FOR SIMULTANEOUS PUSHING INVOLVING GATES 13 & 14.

INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PUSHBACK PROCEDURES, AT BNA, WERE ACCEPTABLE, CONSIDERING; ONE HAZARD WAS IDENTIFIED REGARDING A GUIDE AGENT NOT BEING ABLE TO COMMUNICATE TO THE SAME EFFECTIVINESS AS WHEN HEADSET ARE WORN. DATA DID NOT SUPPORT A HAZZARD OF USING HEADSETS DURING CONDITION (CODE) YELLOW. CORRECTIVE ACTION OF ALLOWING HEADSETS DURING CONDITION (CODE) YELLOW WAS BRIEFED AND APPROVED BY THE COMPANY. IMPLEMENTATION IS CONTINGENT ON ROLLOUT OF NEW WIRELESS HEADSET SYSTEM.

COMPANY WILL FOLLOW-UP WITH CMO ONCE THE IMPLEMENTATION (ROLLOUT OF NEW WIRELESS HEADSET SYSTEM) IS COMPLETED.

Other aircraft in the event · 1

Each aircraft in a collision has its own report.