20200521003409I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Cessna 172N · Melbourne, AR · May 21, 2020

Date
May 21, 2020 · 16:45 local
Place
Melbourne, AR
Phase of flight
Landing: Touchdown
Operating rules
Pilot school (Part 141)
Operator
8OZS
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N738QF
Reported as
Cessna 172N
Reported engine
Lycoming 0-320 series
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificate
Student
Pilot’s flight hours
28 total28 in this make and model5 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Investigation: the lit FSDO was notified via a phone call from the chief pilot of ozarka 141 pilot school on 05/22/2020. The chief pilot indicated that on 05/21/2020 a student pilot while attempting to land on his third solo and performing stage 2, lesson 10 requirements in the traffic pattern, landed on runway 21 at Melbourne, AR (42A) and struck the ground with the prop causing minor damage. No injuries were sustained. Potential 14 CFR 91.103 violation.

Root cause analysis (rca): this deviation was caused by airman ability/proficiency. Pilot failed to maintain control of the aircraft, when control was possible.

Corrective action: the airman, privacy data omitted, corrected the non-compliance completion of three scheduled flights with the chief pilot, and on 06/02/2020 the airman was counseled from the investigating ASI.

Comments: I ensured the airman gained compliance through training, and airman counseling from the investigating ASI. I am satisfied the airman's corrective actions fully address the proficiency and ability aspect, as he is only 10 flight hours into his career, and have reestablished compliance and safe operations. I recommend no further action, reexamination/re-inspection or enforcement.

See related ptrs: SW11202001780/SW11202000801

As the FAA filed it

INVESTIGATION: THE LIT FSDO WAS NOTIFIED VIA A PHONE CALL FROM THE CHIEF PILOT OF OZARKA 141 PILOT SCHOOL ON 05/22/2020. THE CHIEF PILOT INDICATED THAT ON 05/21/2020 A STUDENT PILOT WHILE ATTEMPTING TO LAND ON HIS THIRD SOLO AND PERFORMING STAGE 2, LESSON 10 REQUIREMENTS IN THE TRAFFIC PATTERN, LANDED ON RUNWAY 21 AT MELBOURNE, AR (42A) AND STRUCK THE GROUND WITH THE PROP CAUSING MINOR DAMAGE. NO INJURIES WERE SUSTAINED. POTENTIAL 14 CFR 91.103 VIOLATION.

ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS (RCA): THIS DEVIATION WAS CAUSED BY AIRMAN ABILITY/PROFICIENCY. PILOT FAILED TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OF THE AIRCRAFT, WHEN CONTROL WAS POSSIBLE.

CORRECTIVE ACTION: THE AIRMAN, ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^, CORRECTED THE NON-COMPLIANCE COMPLETION OF THREE SCHEDULED FLIGHTS WITH THE CHIEF PILOT, AND ON 06/02/2020 THE AIRMAN WAS COUNSELED FROM THE INVESTIGATING ASI.

COMMENTS: I ENSURED THE AIRMAN GAINED COMPLIANCE THROUGH TRAINING, AND AIRMAN COUNSELING FROM THE INVESTIGATING ASI. I AM SATISFIED THE AIRMAN'S CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FULLY ADDRESS THE PROFICIENCY AND ABILITY ASPECT, AS HE IS ONLY 10 FLIGHT HOURS INTO HIS CAREER, AND HAVE REESTABLISHED COMPLIANCE AND SAFE OPERATIONS. I RECOMMEND NO FURTHER ACTION, REEXAMINATION/RE-INSPECTION OR ENFORCEMENT.

SEE RELATED PTRS: SW11202001780/SW11202000801

Other reports on N738QF · 2

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.