What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
This accident was due to a ground collision between two aircraft. The pilot of the pitts, (this report AEA0522020) stated that he made a radio call that he was departing runway 23. On rotation, the pitts right wing struck the right wing of a waco (report AEA0522021) that crossed runway 23 as it was taxing from the FBO ramp to intersecting runway 25. The pilot in the waco stated that he heard the pitts transmission that he was departing runway 23, but it didn?t ?click? That the pitts was departing runway 23 since that runway is used for gliders. Contributing factors were the restricted forward view in the pitts during take-off due to the attitude of the aircraft, the restricted views in the waco due to it being a biplane, and the restricted runway view due to the sloping grass runways.
As the FAA filed it
THIS ACCIDENT WAS DUE TO A GROUND COLLISION BETWEEN TWO AIRCRAFT. THE PILOT OF THE PITTS, (THIS REPORT AEA0522020) STATED THAT HE MADE A RADIO CALL THAT HE WAS DEPARTING RUNWAY 23. ON ROTATION, THE PITTS RIGHT WING STRUCK THE RIGHT WING OF A WACO (REPORT AEA0522021) THAT CROSSED RUNWAY 23 AS IT WAS TAXING FROM THE FBO RAMP TO INTERSECTING RUNWAY 25. THE PILOT IN THE WACO STATED THAT HE HEARD THE PITTS TRANSMISSION THAT HE WAS DEPARTING RUNWAY 23, BUT IT DIDN?T ?CLICK? THAT THE PITTS WAS DEPARTING RUNWAY 23 SINCE THAT RUNWAY IS USED FOR GLIDERS. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS WERE THE RESTRICTED FORWARD VIEW IN THE PITTS DURING TAKE-OFF DUE TO THE ATTITUDE OF THE AIRCRAFT, THE RESTRICTED VIEWS IN THE WACO DUE TO IT BEING A BIPLANE, AND THE RESTRICTED RUNWAY VIEW DUE TO THE SLOPING GRASS RUNWAYS.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.