20220815021049I

Incident · No damage

FAA incident report · Cessna 414A · Mitchell, SD · August 15, 2022

Date
August 15, 2022 · 16:11 local
Place
Mitchell, SD
Airport
Mitchell
Phase of flight
Hover/Holding
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
No damage
Aircraft
N2688D
Reported as
Cessna 414A
Reported engine
Continental TSIO-520 series
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0
Pilot’s certificates
Commercial pilot, flight instructor, private pilot

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Description :privacy data omitted was holding at mhe VOR at 5,000 ft. assigned by zmp as lower traffic privacy data omitted was cleared for the approach at kmhe starting at a lower altitude of 4,000FT . Radar tracking on the falcon application showed privacy data omitteddeviating below his assigned altitude in the hold to an altitude of 4,200FT on the turn outbound in the hold'(this showed on falcon radar display as occurring in milliseconds! ) iic interviewed deviating pilot who stated that the autopilot altitude hold had disengaed at that time,and he had only deviated 200FT low and had immediately corrected back to his assigned altitude on the call from zmp. This constituted an altitude deviation by privacy data omitted. Causal/contributing factors: iic believes that the autopilot malfunction and possible mode c altitude malfunction was the main cause of this deviation. A possible lack of pilot vigilance in the hold contributed to this deviation. Corrective action: pilot is a trained professional with proper checking and instrument currency, and is an active CFI, iic counseled pilot on altitude maintaining vigilance in IMC traffic situations while holding. Iic also suggested autopilot and altimeter transponder checks after his review of falcon altitude display which seemed to be physically impossible' no further comments. Sas ar#GL27202201297

As the FAA filed it

DESCRIPTION :^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ WAS HOLDING AT MHE VOR AT 5,000 FT. ASSIGNED BY ZMP AS LOWER TRAFFIC ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ WAS CLEARED FOR THE APPROACH AT KMHE STARTING AT A LOWER ALTITUDE OF 4,000FT . RADAR TRACKING ON THE FALCON APPLICATION SHOWED ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^DEVIATING BELOW HIS ASSIGNED ALTITUDE IN THE HOLD TO AN ALTITUDE OF 4,200FT ON THE TURN OUTBOUND IN THE HOLD'(THIS SHOWED ON FALCON RADAR DISPLAY AS OCCURRING IN MILLISECONDS! ) IIC INTERVIEWED DEVIATING PILOT WHO STATED THAT THE AUTOPILOT ALTITUDE HOLD HAD DISENGAED AT THAT TIME,AND HE HAD ONLY DEVIATED 200FT LOW AND HAD IMMEDIATELY CORRECTED BACK TO HIS ASSIGNED ALTITUDE ON THE CALL FROM ZMP. THIS CONSTITUTED AN ALTITUDE DEVIATION BY ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^. CAUSAL/CONTRIBUTING FACTORS: IIC BELIEVES THAT THE AUTOPILOT MALFUNCTION AND POSSIBLE MODE C ALTITUDE MALFUNCTION WAS THE MAIN CAUSE OF THIS DEVIATION. A POSSIBLE LACK OF PILOT VIGILANCE IN THE HOLD CONTRIBUTED TO THIS DEVIATION. CORRECTIVE ACTION: PILOT IS A TRAINED PROFESSIONAL WITH PROPER CHECKING AND INSTRUMENT CURRENCY, AND IS AN ACTIVE CFI, IIC COUNSELED PILOT ON ALTITUDE MAINTAINING VIGILANCE IN IMC TRAFFIC SITUATIONS WHILE HOLDING. IIC ALSO SUGGESTED AUTOPILOT AND ALTIMETER TRANSPONDER CHECKS AFTER HIS REVIEW OF FALCON ALTITUDE DISPLAY WHICH SEEMED TO BE PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE' NO FURTHER COMMENTS. SAS AR#GL27202201297

Other reports on N2688D · 2

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.