What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Pilot #1 was in process of taxiing from hangar environment to rwy 6R for departure kryn. At the intersection of b and B3, pilot #1 operated their aircraft #1 (tailwheel) into the left wingtip of aircraft #2. Pilot #2 had stopped aircraft #2 in the middle of the intersection of b and B3 after failing to adhere to ATC instructions to hold short of that intersection to give way to aircraft #1. Neither pilot #1 or ATC visually observed aircraft #2 stop in the middle of the intersection. No verbal warnings were issued via radio from ATC or aircraft involved.
Aircraft #1 did not see-and-avoid during taxi while aircraft #2 failed to follow ATC instructions.
Aircraft #1 suffered damage to prop, spinner and cowling. No structural or substantial damage noted.
Aircraft #2 suffered to the left wingtip and aileron. No structural or substantial damage noted.
As the FAA filed it
PILOT #1 WAS IN PROCESS OF TAXIING FROM HANGAR ENVIRONMENT TO RWY 6R FOR DEPARTURE KRYN. AT THE INTERSECTION OF B AND B3, PILOT #1 OPERATED THEIR AIRCRAFT #1 (TAILWHEEL) INTO THE LEFT WINGTIP OF AIRCRAFT #2. PILOT #2 HAD STOPPED AIRCRAFT #2 IN THE MIDDLE OF THE INTERSECTION OF B AND B3 AFTER FAILING TO ADHERE TO ATC INSTRUCTIONS TO HOLD SHORT OF THAT INTERSECTION TO GIVE WAY TO AIRCRAFT #1. NEITHER PILOT #1 OR ATC VISUALLY OBSERVED AIRCRAFT #2 STOP IN THE MIDDLE OF THE INTERSECTION. NO VERBAL WARNINGS WERE ISSUED VIA RADIO FROM ATC OR AIRCRAFT INVOLVED.
AIRCRAFT #1 DID NOT SEE-AND-AVOID DURING TAXI WHILE AIRCRAFT #2 FAILED TO FOLLOW ATC INSTRUCTIONS.
AIRCRAFT #1 SUFFERED DAMAGE TO PROP, SPINNER AND COWLING. NO STRUCTURAL OR SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE NOTED.
AIRCRAFT #2 SUFFERED TO THE LEFT WINGTIP AND AILERON. NO STRUCTURAL OR SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE NOTED.
Other aircraft in the event · 1
Each aircraft in a collision has its own report.