What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
The weather reported in stl was low visibility and snow fall for most of the day, which resulted in a snowy and slushy conditions on the taxiways and apron. Upon selecting the gear up, the aircraft received a master caution warning for “gear disagree”. Nose gear did not indicate retracted and locked.
Crew then actioned the qrh which did not rectify the issue and led the crew to declare a pan pan and return to stl. After a safe landing, crew were met with emergency vehicles and were able to taxi to the gate under the aircrafts own power.
• Maintenance inspected; found ice and slush, landing gear thawed out, aircraft was jacked and gear swings carried out. No faults found. Aircraft was cleared and issue was not replicated
As the FAA filed it
THE WEATHER REPORTED IN STL WAS LOW VISIBILITY AND SNOW FALL FOR MOST OF THE DAY, WHICH RESULTED IN A SNOWY AND SLUSHY CONDITIONS ON THE TAXIWAYS AND APRON. UPON SELECTING THE GEAR UP, THE AIRCRAFT RECEIVED A MASTER CAUTION WARNING FOR “GEAR DISAGREE”. NOSE GEAR DID NOT INDICATE RETRACTED AND LOCKED.
CREW THEN ACTIONED THE QRH WHICH DID NOT RECTIFY THE ISSUE AND LED THE CREW TO DECLARE A PAN PAN AND RETURN TO STL. AFTER A SAFE LANDING, CREW WERE MET WITH EMERGENCY VEHICLES AND WERE ABLE TO TAXI TO THE GATE UNDER THE AIRCRAFTS OWN POWER.
• MAINTENANCE INSPECTED; FOUND ICE AND SLUSH, LANDING GEAR THAWED OUT, AIRCRAFT WAS JACKED AND GEAR SWINGS CARRIED OUT. NO FAULTS FOUND. AIRCRAFT WAS CLEARED AND ISSUE WAS NOT REPLICATED