20250408003859A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Martin Uav VBAT · Douglas, AZ · April 8, 2025

Date
April 8, 2025 · 14:55 local
Place
Douglas, AZ
Airport
Bisbee Douglas International
Phase of flight
Cruise/Level Flight
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N443VA
NTSB investigation
NTSBWPR25LA135
Reported as
Martin Uav Vbat
Reported engine
SUTER TOA-288
People aboard
0
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

On 8 April 2025, a Vbat platform was scheduled for a series of flights as part of its operational testing and validation. The incident in question occurred during the platform's third flight of the day. At 1451 hours, the UAV executed a vertical takeoff from the east end of dug "a" taxiway. In its initial climb and transition to horizontal flight. The aircraft ascended to its designated altitude of 1,500 feet AGL, approximately 1 mile northeast of the airfield, without any anomalies.

Two minutes later, after reaching the desired altitude, the flight team observed a critical engine malfunction with engine RPM readings decreasing to zero, indicating a complete engine failure. Despite this, the UAV maintained a stable data link connection throughout the event, with no additional warnings or error messages displayed on the system interface.

In response to the engine failure, the pilot in command (PIC) quickly assessed the situation using the heads-up display, which provided real-time glide ratio metrics. Using this information, the PIC navigated the UAV towards a pre-determined safe landing zone. The UAV executed a controlled descent, making a safe landing approximately 500 feet east of the "a" taxiway. Throughout the descent and landing, the UAV remained in communication with the control team.

Upon securing the aircraft, the ground crew arrived at the landing site to assess the situation. They placed the UAV into safe mode, powering off the system to prevent any further complications. The crew then conducted a thorough visual inspection, documenting the scene with photographs to aid in subsequent analysis. No immediate hazards were detected in the vicinity of the landing site.

A preliminary analysis of the flight data identified the root cause of the engine failure as a malfunction of the ignition servo. This component failure was isolated as the sole issue, with no other irregularities detected in the aircraft's systems during the data review.

As the FAA filed it

ON 8 APRIL 2025, A VBAT PLATFORM WAS SCHEDULED FOR A SERIES OF FLIGHTS AS PART OF ITS OPERATIONAL TESTING AND VALIDATION. THE INCIDENT IN QUESTION OCCURRED DURING THE PLATFORM'S THIRD FLIGHT OF THE DAY. AT 1451 HOURS, THE UAV EXECUTED A VERTICAL TAKEOFF FROM THE EAST END OF DUG "A" TAXIWAY. IN ITS INITIAL CLIMB AND TRANSITION TO HORIZONTAL FLIGHT. THE AIRCRAFT ASCENDED TO ITS DESIGNATED ALTITUDE OF 1,500 FEET AGL, APPROXIMATELY 1 MILE NORTHEAST OF THE AIRFIELD, WITHOUT ANY ANOMALIES.

TWO MINUTES LATER, AFTER REACHING THE DESIRED ALTITUDE, THE FLIGHT TEAM OBSERVED A CRITICAL ENGINE MALFUNCTION WITH ENGINE RPM READINGS DECREASING TO ZERO, INDICATING A COMPLETE ENGINE FAILURE. DESPITE THIS, THE UAV MAINTAINED A STABLE DATA LINK CONNECTION THROUGHOUT THE EVENT, WITH NO ADDITIONAL WARNINGS OR ERROR MESSAGES DISPLAYED ON THE SYSTEM INTERFACE.

IN RESPONSE TO THE ENGINE FAILURE, THE PILOT IN COMMAND (PIC) QUICKLY ASSESSED THE SITUATION USING THE HEADS-UP DISPLAY, WHICH PROVIDED REAL-TIME GLIDE RATIO METRICS. USING THIS INFORMATION, THE PIC NAVIGATED THE UAV TOWARDS A PRE-DETERMINED SAFE LANDING ZONE. THE UAV EXECUTED A CONTROLLED DESCENT, MAKING A SAFE LANDING APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET EAST OF THE "A" TAXIWAY. THROUGHOUT THE DESCENT AND LANDING, THE UAV REMAINED IN COMMUNICATION WITH THE CONTROL TEAM.

UPON SECURING THE AIRCRAFT, THE GROUND CREW ARRIVED AT THE LANDING SITE TO ASSESS THE SITUATION. THEY PLACED THE UAV INTO SAFE MODE, POWERING OFF THE SYSTEM TO PREVENT ANY FURTHER COMPLICATIONS. THE CREW THEN CONDUCTED A THOROUGH VISUAL INSPECTION, DOCUMENTING THE SCENE WITH PHOTOGRAPHS TO AID IN SUBSEQUENT ANALYSIS. NO IMMEDIATE HAZARDS WERE DETECTED IN THE VICINITY OF THE LANDING SITE.

A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF THE FLIGHT DATA IDENTIFIED THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE ENGINE FAILURE AS A MALFUNCTION OF THE IGNITION SERVO. THIS COMPONENT FAILURE WAS ISOLATED AS THE SOLE ISSUE, WITH NO OTHER IRREGULARITIES DETECTED IN THE AIRCRAFT'S SYSTEMS DURING THE DATA REVIEW.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.