20260106000699A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Adams William E JR Challanger II · Greenbrier, AR · January 6, 2026

Date
January 6, 2026 · 17:00 local
Place
Greenbrier, AR
Airport
Arkavalley
Phase of flight
Landing: Touchdown
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N194JR
NTSB investigation
NTSBCEN26LA085
Reported as
Adams William E JR Challanger II
Reported engine
ROTAX 582SER
People aboard
1
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
1
Pilot’s flight hours
16 total2 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

The PIC purchased the aircraft on the day of the accident. The PIC verbally stated that they did not have a pilot’s certificate and stated on the questionnaire based on FAA form 8020-23 block 31 pilot information that they have 16 hours of flight time with 2 hours in the last year and 0 hours in the make/model (marked on this form as unknown becaus 0 hours is not an option), and no previous experience in a "pusher type aircraft". They stated that it was their intention to high-speed taxi and “crow hop” the aircraft. When the aircraft left the ground, it veered to the left. The PIC applied power in an unsuccessful attempt to realign with the runway for landing. They stated that there was severe turbulence with both updrafts and downdrafts. The airport manager had previously stated that the weather was mild and the winds were light. They entered the pattern to come around for another unsuccessful attempted landing. They attempted to land from the opposite direction but were again unable to land. The next attempt was in the original direction of travel. At approximately 30 feet above the runway, the aircraft was pushed to the left and downward. Correction attempts were unsuccessful, and the aircraft struck the ground, exited the right side of the runway, spun 180 degrees, and came to rest against the barbed wire fence that borders the airfield. The aircraft sustained significant damage. The PIC stated that there were no mechanical or performance issues with the aircraft before the accident. The annual condition inspection was completed on 10/30/2025.

As the FAA filed it

THE PIC PURCHASED THE AIRCRAFT ON THE DAY OF THE ACCIDENT. THE PIC VERBALLY STATED THAT THEY DID NOT HAVE A PILOT’S CERTIFICATE AND STATED ON THE QUESTIONNAIRE BASED ON FAA FORM 8020-23 BLOCK 31 PILOT INFORMATION THAT THEY HAVE 16 HOURS OF FLIGHT TIME WITH 2 HOURS IN THE LAST YEAR AND 0 HOURS IN THE MAKE/MODEL (MARKED ON THIS FORM AS UNKNOWN BECAUS 0 HOURS IS NOT AN OPTION), AND NO PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE IN A "PUSHER TYPE AIRCRAFT". THEY STATED THAT IT WAS THEIR INTENTION TO HIGH-SPEED TAXI AND “CROW HOP” THE AIRCRAFT. WHEN THE AIRCRAFT LEFT THE GROUND, IT VEERED TO THE LEFT. THE PIC APPLIED POWER IN AN UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPT TO REALIGN WITH THE RUNWAY FOR LANDING. THEY STATED THAT THERE WAS SEVERE TURBULENCE WITH BOTH UPDRAFTS AND DOWNDRAFTS. THE AIRPORT MANAGER HAD PREVIOUSLY STATED THAT THE WEATHER WAS MILD AND THE WINDS WERE LIGHT. THEY ENTERED THE PATTERN TO COME AROUND FOR ANOTHER UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPTED LANDING. THEY ATTEMPTED TO LAND FROM THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION BUT WERE AGAIN UNABLE TO LAND. THE NEXT ATTEMPT WAS IN THE ORIGINAL DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. AT APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET ABOVE THE RUNWAY, THE AIRCRAFT WAS PUSHED TO THE LEFT AND DOWNWARD. CORRECTION ATTEMPTS WERE UNSUCCESSFUL, AND THE AIRCRAFT STRUCK THE GROUND, EXITED THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE RUNWAY, SPUN 180 DEGREES, AND CAME TO REST AGAINST THE BARBED WIRE FENCE THAT BORDERS THE AIRFIELD. THE AIRCRAFT SUSTAINED SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE. THE PIC STATED THAT THERE WERE NO MECHANICAL OR PERFORMANCE ISSUES WITH THE AIRCRAFT BEFORE THE ACCIDENT. THE ANNUAL CONDITION INSPECTION WAS COMPLETED ON 10/30/2025.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.