What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
On 01/06/2026 the UAS was flown, spraying 80 acres, near the city of Shreveport, LA. The operator of the UAS was in the process of obtaining the part 137 certificate. As of 02/23/2026 the operator was not certificated as a UAS part 137 operator.
In speaking with the rpic, he stated the UAS was destroyed in flight because the circuit boards overheated, started a fire in which caused the electricity to stop going to the electric engines. The engines stopped and the UAS crashed. No injuries to anyone and no damage to anything other than the UAS.
The manufacturer explained it was a manufacturing error and fixes were already implemented to the existing aircraft currently flying. The manufacturer stated that future aircraft will not have the same problem.
As the FAA filed it
ON 01/06/2026 THE UAS WAS FLOWN, SPRAYING 80 ACRES, NEAR THE CITY OF SHREVEPORT, LA. THE OPERATOR OF THE UAS WAS IN THE PROCESS OF OBTAINING THE PART 137 CERTIFICATE. AS OF 02/23/2026 THE OPERATOR WAS NOT CERTIFICATED AS A UAS PART 137 OPERATOR.
IN SPEAKING WITH THE RPIC, HE STATED THE UAS WAS DESTROYED IN FLIGHT BECAUSE THE CIRCUIT BOARDS OVERHEATED, STARTED A FIRE IN WHICH CAUSED THE ELECTRICITY TO STOP GOING TO THE ELECTRIC ENGINES. THE ENGINES STOPPED AND THE UAS CRASHED. NO INJURIES TO ANYONE AND NO DAMAGE TO ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE UAS.
THE MANUFACTURER EXPLAINED IT WAS A MANUFACTURING ERROR AND FIXES WERE ALREADY IMPLEMENTED TO THE EXISTING AIRCRAFT CURRENTLY FLYING. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT FUTURE AIRCRAFT WILL NOT HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM.