20260617010611I

Incident · Substantial damage

FAA incident report · Aircraft · Bay Point, CA · June 17, 2026

Date
June 17, 2026 · 18:55 local
Place
Bay Point, CA
Phase of flight
Cruise/Level Flight
Operator
DDHA
Collision
Midair collision
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
NONE
People aboard
0
Fatal injuries
0
Other injuries
0

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Company was flight testing multiple UAS compiling information to submit for certification iaw usc 44807 cmd process. A flight plan command was submitted to two separate UAS at the same time, one was registered with the traffic management software and the other wasn't. both received the same flight plan and they flew the routes and collided. Secondary contributions found by the investigation detailed (1) the aircraft were supposed to be offset by altitude (50'), (2) they were supposed to have been separated on parallel routes, (3) the visual observers (vo) failed to adequately determine the heights of the UAS prior to the collision, and (4). The vo's failed to only perform their one task of traffic separation. The vo's were multitasking and not maintaining visual contact with the UAS.

As the FAA filed it

COMPANY WAS FLIGHT TESTING MULTIPLE UAS COMPILING INFORMATION TO SUBMIT FOR CERTIFICATION IAW USC 44807 CMD PROCESS. A FLIGHT PLAN COMMAND WAS SUBMITTED TO TWO SEPARATE UAS AT THE SAME TIME, ONE WAS REGISTERED WITH THE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE AND THE OTHER WASN'T. BOTH RECEIVED THE SAME FLIGHT PLAN AND THEY FLEW THE ROUTES AND COLLIDED. SECONDARY CONTRIBUTIONS FOUND BY THE INVESTIGATION DETAILED (1) THE AIRCRAFT WERE SUPPOSED TO BE OFFSET BY ALTITUDE (50'), (2) THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN SEPARATED ON PARALLEL ROUTES, (3) THE VISUAL OBSERVERS (VO) FAILED TO ADEQUATELY DETERMINE THE HEIGHTS OF THE UAS PRIOR TO THE COLLISION, AND (4). THE VO'S FAILED TO ONLY PERFORM THEIR ONE TASK OF TRAFFIC SEPARATION. THE VO'S WERE MULTITASKING AND NOT MAINTAINING VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE UAS.