- Date
- June 30, 2011, 06:27 local (11:27 UTC)
- Place
- Oconto, WI
- Injuries
- 1 serious, 1 minor
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Phase of flight
- Maneuvering
- Aircraft
- N734MPPowrachute Airwolf 912
- Defining event
- Maneuvering: Aerodynamic stall/spin
- Weather
- Visual (VMC) · Day
- Status
- Completed · report October 6, 2011
- Report
- Approved by Office Director
- NTSB office
- Central Region
- Parties
- FAA- Milwaukee FSDO
- FAA report
- 20110630014619A
- Case key
- 81010
From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.
On this page
Probable cause
The powered parachute pilot's decision to execute an in-flight full-flare which resulted in exceeding the angle of attack capabilities of the parachute wing, and subsequent inadvertent stall.
Findings · 2
NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.
Sequence of events
The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.
Analysis
The powered parachute pilot performed two in-flight flare maneuvers at altitude. He performed the first one, released the flare, and the powered parachute recovered. He performed the second one, but released more slowly and the parachute stalled. The pilot stated that all the cells of the parachute were open as he applied full throttle. The parachute wing remained open and slightly back from vertical. The parachute remained in this condition until it struck the ground. The large increase in parachute wing drag experienced during the full-flare, and the quick full throttle input, created a climbing dynamic pendulum effect that loaded the wing, and resulted in the stall. Federal Aviation Administration guidance stated that a full-flare is normally used and recommended only for landings, as it is a situation that could contribute to a stall.
Factual narrative
The powered parachute was on its third flight, and was carrying the pilot and a passenger. The pilot stated that a normal takeoff was performed. During the flight, the pilot elected to perform an in-flight flare maneuver. The maneuver was similar to a flare used for landing except that it was performed at a higher altitude. The first in-flight flare was performed and released, and the powered parachute recovered. Another in-flight flare was performed and released more slowly, and the parachute stalled. The pilot stated that all the cells of the parachute were open and he applied full throttle. The parachute remained open and slightly back from vertical. It stayed in this condition until the powered parachute struck the ground. Federal Aviation Administration publication "FAA-H-8083-29 - Powered Parachute Flying Handbook" states that powered parachutes have two basic flight controls; steering controls and throttle. The throttle controls thrust and therefore controls altitude for climbing and descending, but does not measurably affect airspeed. Powered parachutes fly at a relatively constant airspeed and angle of attack for normal flying conditions. The handbook also states that, although a powered parachute wing is resistant to stall, conditions that can contribute to a stall include a large increase in wing drag as experienced during a full-flare, and a quick full RPM throttle input, creating a climbing dynamic pendulum effect loading the wing. It also states that a full-flare is normally used and recommended only for landings. The damage to the powered parachute included bending of the cart structure, engine mounting structure, and propeller shroud tubing.
Aircraft
- Registration
- N734MP
- Reported as
- Powrachute Airwolf 912
- Category
- Powered parachute
- Serial number
- A153ULS
- Airframe hours
- 2.5
- Engine
- Rotax 912ULS, 100 horsepower, reciprocating
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal · Part 91
- Airworthiness certificate
- Special, Experimental light sport (Special)
- Last inspection
- Condition · June 28, 2011 · 2.5 hours before
- Departed
- PVT · Abrams, WI
- Destination
- PVT · Abrams, WI
Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.
Flight crew
As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.
- Role
- Pilot
- Age
- 57
- Injuries
- Serious
- Certificate
- Sport Pilot
- Medical
- Sport pilot
- Last flight review
- June 25, 2011
- Seat
- Front
- Flight hours
- 159 total · 159 in this make and model
Weather
- Conditions
- Visual (VMC) · Day
- Wind
- 170° at 3 knots
- Visibility
- 12 statute miles
- Lowest ceiling
- None
- Temperature
- 59 °F
- Altimeter
- 30.05 inHg
Docket · 2
The files NTSB released with the investigation on August 11, 2011, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 2.6 MB in all.
FAA reports on this event · 1
The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.