CEN14CA488

NTSB accident investigation · Piper PA 28-140 · Belen, NM · September 8, 2014

Accident · Minor injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
September 8, 2014, 13:29 local (19:29 UTC)
Place
Belen, NM
Injuries
1 minor
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N6693WPiper PA 28-140
Defining event
Landing-aborted after touchdown: Abrupt maneuver
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report January 12, 2015
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
Central Region
Parties
FAA Albuquerque FSDO
Case key
90042

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The student pilot's improper recovery from a bounced landing.

Findings · 3

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Performance/control parameters: pitch controlAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Incorrect use/operationPiper PA-28-140: 2 casesAll aircraft: 526 casesProbable cause
Performance/control parameters: angle of attackAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Not attained/maintainedPiper PA-28-140: 14 casesAll aircraft: 990 casesProbable cause
Action: incorrect action sequencePersonnel issues › Action/decision · Student/instructed pilotPiper PA-28-140: 3 casesAll aircraft: 77 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

On the student pilot's second solo landing the airplane landed hard and bounced twice. The flight instructor, standing on the side of the runway, radioed instructions to "go-around". The student pilot then applied full power, applied right rudder and retracted one notch of flaps. The flight instructor observed the airplane was then in a steep nose up stalling pitch attitude. He radioed instructions to "pitch down, pitch down", and with the airplane very low to the ground and drifting left, the student pilot radioed back asking the flight instructor to "say again". Control was lost and the airplane impacted a hangar about 650 feet to the left of runway center line. The impact resulted in substantial damage to the fuselage, empennage, tail surfaces, and both wings which were completely separated as the airplane penetrated the hangar wall. The fuselage came to rest inside the closed hangar and there was no postimpact fire. The student pilot reported that had attempted the go-around with too much pitch, too little speed, and not enough rudder input. He also reported that the accident would not have happened if he had spent more of his attention "flying the plane" and less attention communicating on the radio during a critical phase of flight. Additionally, the student pilot reported there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

Factual narrative

On the student pilot's second solo landing the airplane landed hard and bounced twice. The flight instructor, standing on the side of the runway, radioed instructions to "go-around". The student pilot then applied full power, applied right rudder and retracted one notch of flaps. The flight instructor observed the airplane was then in a steep nose up stalling pitch attitude. He radioed instructions to "pitch down, pitch down", and with the airplane very low to the ground and drifting left, the student pilot radioed back asking the flight instructor to "say again". Control was lost and the airplane impacted a hangar about 650 feet to the left of runway center line. The impact resulted in substantial damage to the fuselage, empennage, tail surfaces, and both wings which were completely separated as the airplane penetrated the hangar wall. The fuselage came to rest inside the closed hangar and there was no postimpact fire. The student pilot reported that had attempted the go-around with too much pitch, too little speed, and not enough rudder input. He also reported that the accident would not have happened if he had spent more of his attention "flying the plane" and less attention communicating on the radio during a critical phase of flight. Additionally, the student pilot reported there were no preaccident mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation.

Aircraft

Registration
N6693W
Reported as
Piper PA 28-140
Category
Airplane
Serial number
28-21284
Built
1965
Airframe hours
10,300
Engine
Lycoming 0-320 SERIES, 160 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
100 hour · August 10, 2014
Departed
E80 · Belen, NM
Destination
E80 · Belen, NM
Airport
E80 · Alexander Muni, runway 21, 6,601 × 60 ft, asphalt
Equipment
Stall warning system

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Student pilot
Age
45
Injuries
Minor
Certificate
Student
Medical
Class 3, With waivers/limitations
Last flight review
September 7, 2014
Seat
Left
Restraint
Lap only
Flight hours
19 total · 19 in this make and model · 19 in the last 90 days · 13 in the last 30 days

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
280° at 3 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
79 °F, dew point 52 °F
Altimeter
30.22 inHg
Observed at
KE80

Docket · 6

The files NTSB released with the investigation on December 15, 2014, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 10.7 MB in all.