CEN19LA315

NTSB accident investigation · Piper PA34 · Kingman, KS · September 11, 2019

Accident · No injuriesClass 3 · LimitedFinal report
Date
September 11, 2019, 12:36 local (17:36 UTC)
Place
Kingman, KS
Injuries
1 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N328RGPiper PA34
Defining event
Landing: Landing gear not configured
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed
Report
Approved by Office Director
Investigation class
Class 3
NTSB office
Central Region
Parties
Federal Aviation Administration, Wichita FSDO
FAA report
20190911017209A
Case key
100242

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The malfunction of the landing gear extension system for reasons that could not be determined with the available evidence.

Findings · 2

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Not determinedNot determined › Not determined · Unknown/Not determinedPiper PA-34-200T: 4 casesAll aircraft: 2,247 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The pilot was on a personal flight when, during final approach for landing, the gear unsafe warning horn sounded. The pilot made a go-around when he saw the gear safe indicator lights were not illuminated. The pilot verified, with another pilot on the ground, that the landing gear were not extended after several attempts to extend the landing gear, including using the emergency extension procedure. The pilot then made a wheels-up landing on the runway, during which the airplane’s lower fuselage structural longerons were substantially damaged. After the accident, the landing gear extended into the down-and-locked position when the airplane was hoisted off the runway surface using a crane and straps. Postaccident examination and testing revealed no issues with the normal landing gear extension/retraction system or the emergency extension procedure. The investigation was unable to duplicate the pilot’s report that he was unable to extend the landing gear using the normal and/or emergency procedures during the flight. The reason for the malfunction of the landing gear extension system could not be determined based on the available evidence.

Factual narrative

On September 11, 2019, about 1236 central daylight time, a Piper PA-34-200T airplane, N328RG, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Kingman, Kansas. The pilot was not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that he placed the landing gear selector handle to the gear-down position when the airplane was on the downwind leg for runway 18 at Kingman Airport (9K8), Kingman, Kansas, and that he performed a "before landing check" while turning from the base to final legs. As the airplane crossed over the runway threshold at 50 ft he reduced both throttle levers to idle for landing, and the gear unsafe warning horn sounded. The pilot reported that he immediately advanced engine power for a go-around when he saw the gear safe indicator lights were not illuminated. He then asked another pilot, who had just landed, to confirm the position of the airplane's landing gear. The pilot on the ground confirmed that all three landing gear were retracted. The accident pilot departed the traffic pattern, flew west of the airport, and climbed to 2,500 ft mean sea level to troubleshoot the landing gear malfunction. He verified that the navigation lights were turned off because they automatically dim the landing gear indicator lights for nighttime flying. The pilot then noticed that the 25-ampere circuit breaker for the landing gear hydraulic motor was tripped. The pilot reset the circuit breaker and then selected gear down; however, the circuit breaker tripped again. The pilot returned to the airport for a second time and asked the pilot on the ground to confirm the position of the landing gear. The pilot on the ground stated that the landing gear were still retracted. The pilot then referred to the pilot operating handbook (POH) emergency landing gear extension procedure. The emergency extension only requires that hydraulic pressure be released from the system, which allows the landing gear to drop due to gravity and is assisted by aerodynamic loads and spring force. Pulling a red emergency handle in the cockpit releases the hydraulic pressure in the system. The pilot reported that he was unable to extend the landing gear using the emergency procedure, and the pilot on the ground also reconfirmed that the landing gear were still retracted. The accident pilot continued to circle the airport while he continued to troubleshoot the landing gear system malfunction. He stated that he made multiple attempts to extend the landing gear by inducing g-loads without success. The pilot made another pass over the runway and the pilot on the ground again reconfirmed that the landing gear were still retracted. The accident pilot, now concerned about having minimum fuel, asked the pilot on the ground to call 911 and ask for emergency crews to be sent to the airport. The accident pilot also radioed the Wichita approach controller, declared an emergency, and told the controllerthat he planned to make a wheels-up landing at 9K8. The pilot reported that he extended the wing flaps for the wheels-up landing. The pilot stated that, as the airplane neared touchdown, a gust of wind caused the airplane to “balloon” to 10 ft above the runway, which was followed by a hard landing on the runway. The airport manager reported that the landing gear extended into a down-and-locked position when the airplane was hoisted off the runway surface using a crane and straps. The airplane was subsequently towed to the pilot's hangar for additional examination and testing. According to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airworthiness inspector, the airplane’s lower fuselage structural longerons were substantially damaged during the wheels-up landing. The airplane was placed on jack stands to test the landing gear retraction/extension system. The 25-ampere landing gear motor circuit breaker was reset, and the landing gear retracted normally when the master power switch was turned on and the landing gear position selector handle was placed to the gear up position. The landing gear then extended normally when the landing gear position selector handle was placed to the gear down position. The landing gear was cycled (up/down) two additional times without any issues using the normal extension/retraction procedure. The landing gear was retracted to test the emergency extension procedure included in the POH. The landing gear immediately dropped into the down and locked position when the red emergency extension handle in the cockpit was pulled. The landing gear was retracted for a second emergency extension procedure test, and the landing gear extended without any issues. The inspection panels were removed from the airplane’s nose section to inspect the hydraulic motor assembly. There were no hydraulic leaks observed from the motor assembly or the associated hydraulic lines, and the hydraulic pump contained an adequate amount of fluid. The landing gear was cycled (up/down) a final time using the normal procedures, and there were no issues observed.

Aircraft

Registration
N328RG
Reported as
Piper PA34 (200T)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
34-7570061
Built
1975
Airframe hours
2,752.2
Engines
Continental TSIO-360-EB1, 200 horsepower, reciprocatingContinental TSIO-360-EB1, 200 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal · Part 91
Operator
Aircraft Resource Management, LLC
Registered owner
Aircraft Resource Management, LLC
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · November 8, 2018 · 100.9 hours before
Departed
ICT · Wichita, KS
Destination
9K8 · Kingman, KS
Flight plan
VFR
Airport
9K8 · Kingman Airport, runway 18, 4,300 × 75 ft, concrete
Equipment
Stall warning system

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
42
Injuries
None
Certificate
Airline transport
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, With waivers/limitations
Last flight review
September 4, 2019
Seat
Left
Restraint
Lap only
Flight hours
5,760 total · 225 in this make and model · 4,932 as pilot in command · 103 in the last 90 days · 19 in the last 30 days · 0.8 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
190° at 17 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
90 °F, dew point 68 °F
Altimeter
30.01 inHg
Observed at
HUT, 27 nm away
METAR
METAR KHUT 111752Z 19017KT 10SM CLR 32/20 A3001 RMK AO2 SLP135 T03170200 10317 20217 58006=

Docket · 9

The files NTSB released with the investigation on August 22, 2022, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 3.0 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.