DCA25LA025

NTSB accident investigation · Boeing 737-9 · Houston, TX · October 24, 2024

Accident · No injuriesClass 4 · LimitedFinal report
Date
October 24, 2024, 12:52 local (17:52 UTC)
Place
Houston, TX
Injuries
145 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N27515Boeing 737-9
Defining event
Landing-landing roll: Aircraft structural failure
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed
Report
Approved by Office Director
Investigation class
Class 4 - Basic report with no Prelim publish
NTSB office
Major Investigations Division
Parties
United Airlines, FAA
FAA report
20241024022239A
Case key
195444

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

Brake application before all three landing gears were on the ground, which caused the failure of the right main landing gear tires and resulted in tire fragments impacting the fuselage.

Findings · 3

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Landing gear system: tire casingAircraft › Aircraft systems · FailureBoeing 737-9: 1 caseAll aircraft: 36 casesProbable cause
Action: incorrect action performancePersonnel issues › Action/decision · Flight crewBoeing 737-9: 2 casesAll aircraft: 1,386 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

United Airlines flight 1181 experienced a failure of the number 3 and number 4 tires on the right main landing gear (MLG) during landing on runway 26L at George Bush Intercontinental/Houston Airport (IAH), Houston, Texas. The airplane exited the runway and stopped on a high-speed taxiway, and the passengers were deplaned and bussed to the terminal. Post landing inspection revealed substantial damage to the aircraft fuselage skin. The captain was the pilot flying and the first officer (FO) was the pilot monitoring for the entire duration of the flight. During preflight preparations for departure from Harry Reid International Airport (LAS), Las Vegas, Nevada, both pilots reviewed the flight release and noted three Minimum Equipment List (MEL) items: the autobrake system, the antiskid system, and a coffee maker. The autobrake and antiskid systems had been deferred earlier that morning due to maintenance issues, specifically an antiskid alert light that failed to test correctly. Given these deferrals, the crew stated they reviewed the enroute and destination weather conditions and reviewed operational limitations with the MEL items. Weather was visual flight rules (VFR) at both departure and destination airports. The crew determined that all MEL-related limitations were satisfied, including the need for a dry runway, no tailwind, use of flaps 40 for landing, and sufficient landing distance. The aircraft departed LAS without incident. During descent into Houston, the crew stated they conducted the approach briefing, incorporating the limitations due to the MEL items. The FO noted a slight tailwind component on Runway 26L and requested an opposite-direction landing due to the autobrake and antiskid systems not available. However, Houston approach air traffic control (ATC) was unable to accommodate the request due to traffic volume and airspace restrictions. Winds were later reported as calm, and the crew proceeded with a visual approach to Runway 26L. When the FO did a final wind check with the tower, they were informed of a direct left-to-right crosswind relative to the runway, at 8 knots. Both the captain and FO described the landing as soft and initially uneventful. The speed brakes deployed automatically, and the captain stated he applied brakes and activated the thrust reversers. However, shortly after the reversers were deployed, the captain perceived an abnormal condition, suspecting a tire failure due to the unusual noise and slight lateral swaying. The FO described the sensation as skidding followed by grinding and noted that the aircraft did not roll smoothly below 10 knots, with a right-wing-down lean. The captain suspected a blown tire and steered the aircraft off the runway and onto a high-speed taxiway. A review of the FDR data for the landing show that as the pitch angle was reduced, the brake pressure began to rise to about 500 psi, prior to the right MLG air/ground switch changing to “ground”. After the right MLG was on the ground,the brake pressure continued to rise, peaking at about 1500 psi as the left MLG air/ground switch changed to “ground”. Brake pressure then eased to about 1000 psi as the nose gear air/ground switch changed to “ground” and the vertical acceleration peaked at about 1.3g. About one second later, there was a second spike in vertical acceleration to 1.3g, concurrent with an increased roll attitude to about 2 degrees right wing down, consistent with the failure of the right MLG tires. Since the autobraking and antiskid systems were disabled, the flight crew had to manually apply brakes during the landing. The FDR data showed that the brake application happened before all three landing gear had changed to “ground” status, and likely before the wheels had an opportunity to fully spin up. The early application of the brakes during the landing likely contributed to the failure of the tires on the right MLG. The ATC tower reported seeing smoke emanating from the aircraft during rollout, prompting the crew to request emergency vehicles. Upon stopping, ground personnel confirmed that both tires on the right MLG were severely damaged. The crew started the auxiliary power unit (APU), shut down the engines, and completed the after-landing and parking checklists. Passengers were informed of the situation and deplaned via air stairs approximately 40–45 minutes after landing. Buses transported all passengers and crew to the terminal. No injuries were reported. Post landing inspection showed an impact dent on the fuselage above the right MLG. The affected area is identified in the United Airlines structural repair manual (SRM) as a principal structural element and required repair utilizing the techniques identified in the SRM. Inspection of the frames, stringers, and shear ties near the damaged area showed no damage to any adjacent areas.

Aircraft

Registration
N27515
Reported as
Boeing 737-9
Category
Airplane
Serial number
43452
Built
2020
Airframe hours
12,085
Engines
CFM International LEAP-1B28G06, 28,000 lbs thrust, turbo fanCFM International LEAP-1B28G06, 28,000 lbs thrust, turbo fan
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Part 121
Operator
United Airlines
Registered owner
Wilmington Trust Co Trustee
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Commuter
Last inspection
Continuous airworthiness · October 9, 2024
Departed
LAS · Las Vegas, NV
Destination
Same as departure
Flight plan
IFR
Airport
IAH · George Bush Intcntl/Houston, runway 26L, 9,402 × 150 ft, concrete
Equipment
Data recorder, Electronic flight bag or handheld device, Electronic multifunction display, Electronic primary flight display, Onboard weather, Satellite tracking device, Auto-pilot, Stall warning system, ADS-B

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 2

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
58
Injuries
None
Certificates
Recreational, Commercial, Flight instructor, Airline transport, Sport Pilot
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land, Multi-engine land, Single-engine sea, Multi-engine sea
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, With waivers/limitations
Last flight review
September 5, 2024
Seat
Left
Restraint
5-point
Flight hours
20,092 total · 4,258 in this make and model · 7,202 as pilot in command · 187 in the last 90 days · 65 in the last 30 days · 2 in the last 24 hours
Role
Co-pilot
Age
40
Injuries
None
Certificate
Airline transport
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane, Powered-lift
Medical
Class 1, Without waivers/limitations
Last flight review
September 5, 2024
Seat
Right
Restraint
5-point
Flight hours
3,889 total · 1,563 in this make and model · 1,086 as pilot in command · 130 in the last 90 days · 50 in the last 30 days · 7 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
150° at 8 knots
Lowest ceiling
3,500 ft broken
Temperature
82 °F
Altimeter
30.09 inHg
Observed at
KIAH

Docket · 4

The files NTSB released with the investigation on September 23, 2025, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 2.7 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.