DCA26LA142

NTSB accident investigation · Boeing 787 · Houston, TX · February 27, 2026

Accident · No injuriesClass 4 · LimitedFinal report
Date
February 27, 2026, 13:53 UTC
Place
Houston, TX
Injuries
209 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
JA873ABoeing 787
Defining event
Landing-flare/touchdown: Tailstrike
Weather
Instrument (IMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report September 8, 2026
Report
Approved by Office Director
Investigation class
Class 4 - Basic report with no Prelim publish
NTSB office
Major Investigations Division
Parties
Boeing, FAA, JTSB, All Nippon Airways
Case key
202574

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The captain’s inadvertent activation of the takeoff/go around switch at touchdown that caused an increase in the airplane pitch attitude that was not corrected before the lower fuselage contacted the runway.

Findings · 3

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Action: incorrect action selectionPersonnel issues › Action/decision · PilotAll aircraft: 397 casesProbable cause
Use of equip/info: aircraft controlPersonnel issues › Task performance · PilotAll aircraft: 9,295 casesProbable cause
Fuselage: fuselage main structureAircraft › Aircraft structures · Damaged/degradedAll aircraft: 24 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

TailstrikeLanding-flare/touchdownAll aircraft: 124 casesDefining event

Analysis

All Nippon Airways (ANA) flight 114 experienced a tailstrike during landing on runway 26L at Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH), Houston, Texas. The scheduled international passenger flight was operated under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 129. The airplane sustained substantial damage and there were no injuries to the 12 crewmembers and 197 passengers on board. At the time of the accident, the captain was the pilot flying and the first officer (FO) was the pilot monitoring. According to the flight crew, the visibility at IAH was forecast to be poor due to fog. Based on the conditions at IAH, the flight crew elected to perform a Category III (CAT III) approach and landing using the airplane’s autoland system. The flight crew recalled no issues during the approach. When the airplane touched down, the captain stated he confirmed the engine thrust levers were at full idle. The captain recalled the speedbrakes deployed, and as he moved to raise the thrust reversers, he noted that the nose of the airplane rose unexpectedly. The captain manually pushed the control column forward with enough force to both disconnect the autopilot and lower the nose, but pulled the column back to prevent the nose landing gear from “slamming down.” The FO recalled the touchdown was smooth and recognized the speedbrakes had deployed. The FO was looking at the flight mode annunciator (FMA), located at the top on the primary flight display (PFD), and called out that the system entered takeoff/go around (TOGA) mode. The FO recalled the three fields for the FMA showed the following from left to right: 1) a blank field, 2) TOGA, and 3) TOGA. The captain and FO did not recall the TOGA switch was pressed. The flight crew recalled the pitch attitude rose to about 7.5° on the PFD. The flight crew did not recall any further issues during the remainder of the landing roll. While exiting the runway, the captain recalled seeing a “tailstrike” message on the engine indicating and crew alerting system (EICAS). Postlanding inspection of the airplane confirmed substantial damage to the lower fuselage consistent with its contact with the runway. Additionally, scraping damage was found on the tailstrike sensor and on an antenna on the lower fuselage. There was no reported mechanical malfunction that contributed to the excessive airplane pitch angle after the airplane touched down. The recorded flight data showed that the autopilot pitch mode and autothrottle mode were both in “flare” mode at the time the airplane touched down on the runway. About half a second after touchdown, the flight data showed the TOGA switch was pressed. As a result, the autopilot pitch and autothrottle modes both transitioned to TOGA mode. However, the autothrottle TOGA mode was canceled when the throttles were moved to reverse thrust. The autopilot pitch mode, still in TOGA mode, commanded the elevator and stabilizer to target a go-around pitch attitude, with the pitchattitude increasing from 3.5° to 7.4° over 2 seconds. About 5 seconds after TOGA mode was activated, the control column was pushed forward (airplane nose down) and 2 seconds later showed a peak control column force of 40 pounds, which disconnected the autopilot. At that time, the airplane pitch attitude reached 7.8°, sufficient to result in a tailstrike, with a subsequent peak value of 7.9°. The flight data also showed the tailstrike protection function had activated and was commanding an elevator deflection, after the TOGA switch was pressed, to reduce elevator deflection. However, the tailstrike protection function could not prevent the pitch attitude increase that resulted in the tailstrike due to its limited authority. According to flight crew statements, they did not recall pressing the TOGA switch and did not believe they pressed them. There was no evidence of an autopilot system malfunction, therefore it is likely the captain inadvertently pressed the TOGA switch when he reached for the thrust reversers at touchdown. According to the airplane manufacturer, the conditions that inhibit TOGA activation were not yet satisfied when the TOGA switch was pressed, allowing for both the autopilot pitch mode and autothrottle mode to transition to TOGA. The flight crew was unaware that TOGA mode was activated, and their delayed detection of the increase in pitch attitude prevented timely application of corrective pitch control inputs to avert the tailstrike.

Aircraft

Registration
JA873A
Reported as
Boeing 787 (9)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
34530
Built
2015
Airframe hours
44,393.8
Engines
Rolls-Royce Trent 1000K2, 78,129 lbs thrust, turbo fanRolls-Royce Trent 1000K3, 78,129 lbs thrust, turbo fan
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Part 129
Operator
All Nippon Airlines
Registered owner
All Nippon Airlines
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Transport
Last inspection
Continuous airworthiness · February 23, 2026
Departed
HND · Tokyo, OF
Destination
Same as departure
Flight plan
IFR
Airport
IAH · George Bush Intcntl/Houston, runway 08R/26L, 9,402 × 150 ft, concrete
Equipment
ADS-B, Angle of attack indicator, Auto-pilot, Data recorder, Electronic flight bag or handheld device, Electronic multifunction display, Electronic primary flight display, Heads up display, Onboard weather, Stall warning system

Flight crew · 3

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
56
Injuries
None
Certificates
Commercial, Private, Airline transport
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Unknown
Seat
Left
Restraint
5-point
Flight hours
16,413 total · 2,969 in this make and model · 8,142 as pilot in command
Role
Co-pilot
Age
34
Injuries
None
Certificates
Commercial, Airline transport, Private
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Unknown
Seat
Right
Restraint
5-point
Flight hours
3,929 total · 2,575 in this make and model · 86 as pilot in command
Role
Other flight crew
Injuries
None
Certificates
Airline transport, Private, Commercial
Medical
Unknown
Seat
Rear
Restraint
5-point

Weather

Conditions
Instrument (IMC) · Day
Wind
Calm
Lowest ceiling
200 ft
Temperature
63 °F, dew point 63 °F
Altimeter
29.99 inHg
Observed at
IAH

Docket · 4

The files NTSB released with the investigation on September 8, 2026, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 3.2 MB in all.