ERA14LA008

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 172 - F · Gainesville, FL · October 5, 2013

Accident · Minor injuriesLimited investigationFinal report
Date
October 5, 2013, 16:00 local (20:00 UTC)
Place
Gainesville, FL
Injuries
2 minor
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Maneuvering
Aircraft
N8715UCessna 172 - F
Defining event
Maneuvering-low-alt flying: Loss of engine power (total)
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report March 26, 2015
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
Eastern Region Aviation
Parties
FSDO/FAA
FAA report
20131005023539A
Case key
88248

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

A total loss of engine power for reasons that could not be determined because a postaccident engine examination and test run revealed no anomalies.

Findings · 2

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Not determinedNot determined › Not determined · Unknown/Not determinedCessna 172F: 5 casesAll aircraft: 2,247 casesProbable cause
Object/animal/substance: ground vehicleEnvironmental issues › Physical environment · Contributed to outcomeCessna 172F: 1 caseAll aircraft: 132 cases

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The pilot reported that, about 20 minutes into the banner tow flight, he noticed that the airplane had descended about 100 ft from its established altitude. He responded by increasing engine power and enriching the mixture while observing that the oil temperature gauge was indicating "hotter than normal." The airplane continued to descend, the oil temperature continued to rise into the red arc, and the engine subsequently experienced a total loss of power. The pilot released the banner and then unsuccessfully attempted to restart the engine. He then conducted a forced landing to a nearby field. The airplane impacted a parked vehicle, which resulted in substantial damage to the fuselage and both wings. Postaccident engine examinations revealed no mechanical malfunctions or failures, and a test run was conducted using the fuel onboard at the time of the accident with no anomalies observed.

Factual narrative

On October 5, 2013, about 1600 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 172F, N8715U, was substantially damaged during a forced landing following a total loss of engine power near Gainesville, Florida. The commercial pilot and pilot-rated passenger sustained minor injuries. The local banner tow flight departed Gainesville Regional Airport (GNV) about 1540. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the flight, which was conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The pilot stated that a preflight inspection of the airplane revealed no anomalies, and he subsequently departed on the flight and performed the banner pick-up. He proceeded toward the stadium around which he was to tow the banner, leveled the airplane at 1,200 feet above ground level (AGL), reduced engine power to 2,250 rpm, and leaned the mixture. He then extended the wing flaps to 10 degrees, and slowed the airplane to 50 mph. About 20 minutes into the flight, the pilot noticed that the airplane had descended about 100 feet, and he responded by increasing engine power and enriching the mixture, while observing that the oil temperature gauge indicated "hotter than normal." The airplane continued to descend and the oil temperature continued to rise into the red arc, and the engine subsequently experienced a total loss of power. The pilot released the banner, attempted to restart the engine to no avail, and then conducted a forced landing to a nearby field. He stated that due to "excessive airspeed" upon touchdown, the airplane bounced and impacted a parked truck, resulting in substantial damage to the fuselage and both wings. The pilot held a commercial pilot certificate with ratings for airplane single- and multi-engine land, as well as an instrument rating; and flight instructor certificate with ratings for airplane single- and multi-engine, and instrument airplane. His most recent first-class Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) medical certificate was issued in September 2013. Following the accident, he reported 2,513 total hours of flight experience, of which 1,402 hours were in the accident airplane make and model. The airplane was manufactured in 1965, and was equipped with a Lycoming O-360-A1A, 200 hp, reciprocating engine. Its most recent annual inspection was completed July 24, 2013. At the time of the accident, the airplane had accumulated 4,989 total hours of operation. According to the operator, the airplane was being operated on automotive fuel. Review of the airplane's airworthiness records showed that no supplemental type certificate had been issued authorizing the use of automotive fuels. Following the accident, the airplane was removed from the site and subsequently examined by an FAA inspector. The engine exhibited little impact damage. The carburetor remained attached; however, the carburetor heat cable was disconnected and hanging free from the firewall. The magnetos remained attached and undamaged. Theengine contained 7 quarts of oil. The oil filter was removed and opened, with no anomalies observed. The spark plugs were removed and appeared "blackish" in color. The electric fuel pump and starter were replaced, and the engine was secured for a test run. Utilizing the fuel onboard at the time of the accident, the engine started and ran for several minutes with no anomalies observed. A fuel sample was taken from the carburetor prior to the test run, and sent for analysis at an aviation fuel testing laboratory. According to the laboratory, a Karl Fisher water test revealed "high" water content, and a microbial test was negative for bacteria and fungus. The quantity of the sample provided was insufficient to conduct distillation and flash point tests; therefore it could not be determined if the sample contained ethanol. The 1553 recorded weather at GNV, 5 miles southwest of the accident site included wind from 090 degrees at 6 knots, 10 miles visibility, sky clear, temperature 31 degrees C, dew point 19 degrees C, and a barometric altimeter setting of 30.00 inches of mercury. Review of an FAA carburetor icing probability chart revealed the potential for serious icing at glide power given the atmospheric conditions present about the time of the accident.

Aircraft

Registration
N8715U
Reported as
Cessna 172 - F (F)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
17252619
Built
1965
Airframe hours
4,989
Engine
Lycoming O-360, 145 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Banner tow · Part 91
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Utility; Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · July 24, 2013
Departed
GNV · Gainesville, FL
Destination
GNV · Gainesville, FL
Equipment
Stall warning system

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
28
Injuries
Minor
Certificates
Flight instructor, Commercial
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, With waivers/limitations
Last flight review
October 22, 2011
Seat
Left
Restraint
None
Flight hours
2,513 total · 1,402 in this make and model · 2,282 as pilot in command · 89 in the last 90 days · 48 in the last 30 days · 1 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
90° at 6 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
88 °F, dew point 66 °F
Altimeter
30.00 inHg
Observed at
GNV, 5 nm away

Docket · 12

The files NTSB released with the investigation on March 3, 2015, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 2.9 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.