ERA15CA154

NTSB accident investigation · Beech 58 · Monroe, NC · March 4, 2015

Accident · No injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
March 4, 2015, 09:38 local (14:38 UTC)
Place
Monroe, NC
Injuries
4 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N50NHBeech 58
Defining event
Landing-flare/touchdown: Landing area overshoot
Weather
Instrument (IMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report August 11, 2015
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
Eastern Region Aviation
Parties
FAA/FSDO
FAA report
20150304003379A
Case key
90868

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The pilot's failure to maintain a proper glidepath and failure to perform a go-around once a safe landing could not accomplished, which resulted in a landing area overshoot and runway excursion.

Findings · 2

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Performance/control parameters: descent/approach/glide pathAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Not attained/maintainedBeech 58: 2 casesAll aircraft: 809 casesProbable cause
Action: incorrect action selectionPersonnel issues › Action/decision · PilotBeech 58: 4 casesAll aircraft: 397 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The pilot had initially intended to perform a GPS approach to runway 23, into the wind; however, the weather was below minimums for that approach and he then elected to perform an instrument landing system (ILS) approach in the opposite direction to runway 5. While about 100 feet above decision height for the ILS approach to runway 5, the pilot did not have the runway environment in sight and started to make the motions to go-around, but did not increase engine power. He then observed the runway centerline markings and due to excess speed and a tailwind, the airplane floated and landed long. When asked about the touchdown point location and speed at touchdown, the pilot estimated it was about 1,000 feet before the departure end of the 7,001-foot-long runway, at a speed of 85 knots. He applied the brakes, but the runway was wet and he did not feel deceleration. He left the flaps fully extended as the airplane traveled off the end of the runway, coming to rest upright in a grass area. The pilot added that there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions with the airplane. The recorded weather at the airport, about the time of the accident, included an 11-knot tailwind. Examination of the wreckage by a Federal Aviation Administration inspector revealed damage to the landing gear and lower fuselage.

Factual narrative

The pilot had initially intended to perform a GPS approach to runway 23, into the wind; however, the weather was below minimums for that approach and he then elected to perform an instrument landing system (ILS) approach in the opposite direction to runway 5. While about 100 feet above decision height for the ILS approach to runway 5, the pilot did not have the runway environment in sight and started to make the motions to go-around, but did not increase engine power. He then observed the runway centerline markings and due to excess speed and a tailwind, the airplane floated and landed long. When asked about the touchdown point location and speed at touchdown, the pilot estimated it was about 1,000 feet before the departure end of the 7,001-foot-long runway, at a speed of 85 knots. He applied the brakes, but the runway was wet and he did not feel deceleration. He left the flaps fully extended as the airplane traveled off the end of the runway, coming to rest upright in a grass area. The pilot added that there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions with the airplane. The recorded weather at the airport, about the time of the accident, included an 11-knot tailwind. Examination of the wreckage by a Federal Aviation Administration inspector revealed damage to the landing gear and lower fuselage.

Aircraft

Registration
N50NH
Reported as
Beech 58
Category
Airplane
Serial number
TH-1030
Built
1979
Airframe hours
4,432.3
Engines
Cont Motor IO-520-CB, 285 horsepower, reciprocatingCont Motor IO-520-CB, 285 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Business · Part 91
Operator
Brick Street Mutual Insurance Company
Registered owner
Mountain State Insurance Agency
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · August 20, 2014 · 154 hours before
Departed
CRW · Charleston, WV
Destination
EQY · Monroe, NC
Flight plan
IFR
Airport
EQY · Charlotte-Monroe County, runway 05, 7,001 × 100 ft, asphalt
Equipment
Auto-pilot, Electronic flight bag or handheld device, Electronic multifunction display, Stall warning system, Onboard weather

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
67
Injuries
None
Certificates
Flight instructor, Commercial
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 2, With waivers/limitations
Last flight review
November 9, 2013
Seat
Left
Restraint
3-point
Flight hours
14,500 total · 900 in this make and model · 14,500 as pilot in command · 66.8 in the last 90 days · 33.4 in the last 30 days · 0 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Instrument (IMC) · Day
Wind
230° at 11 knots
Visibility
0.25 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
200 ft indefinitevv
Temperature
54 °F, dew point 52 °F
Altimeter
30.03 inHg
Observed at
EQY

Docket · 8

The files NTSB released with the investigation on July 28, 2015, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 24.3 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.