ERA16CA294

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 152 · Newnan, GA · August 17, 2016

Accident · No injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
August 17, 2016, 10:00 local (14:00 UTC)
Place
Newnan, GA
Injuries
1 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N5250BCessna 152
Defining event
Landing: Landing area overshoot
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report October 27, 2016
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
Eastern Region Aviation
Parties
FAA/FSDO
FAA report
20160817023079A
Case key
93852

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The student pilot's improper decision to land long and maintain excessive speed during the landing roll. Contributing to the accident was the student pilot's decision to maintain full flaps and aft yoke inputs at a higher speed, reducing his ability to stop the airplane on the runway.

Findings · 5

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Performance/control parameters: descent/approach/glide pathAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Not attained/maintainedCessna 152: 12 casesAll aircraft: 809 casesProbable cause
Performance/control parameters: surface speed/brakingAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Incorrect use/operationCessna 152: 3 casesAll aircraft: 238 casesProbable cause
Info processing/decision: decision making/judgmentPersonnel issues › Action/decision · Student/instructed pilotCessna 152: 33 casesAll aircraft: 3,098 casesProbable cause
Use of equip/info: use of equip/systemPersonnel issues › Task performance · Student/instructed pilotCessna 152: 7 casesAll aircraft: 1,391 casesProbable cause
TerrainEnvironmental issues › Physical environment · Contributed to outcomeCessna 152: 4 casesAll aircraft: 267 cases

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The solo student pilot reported that he was on final approach for a full stop landing when he observed another airplane waiting for the active runway. He intentionally landed long to accommodate the traffic and then "made [the] decision to keep up speed" in order to exit the runway quickly. He misjudged his speed and the airplane departed the right side of the runway, continued across a taxiway, and then down an embankment before nosing over. He later reported that the wheel brakes were less effective because he had full flaps selected. Also, he had applied aft yoke inputs, which minimized the effectiveness of the nose wheel steering system. A Federal Aviation Administration inspector examined the wreckage and reported that the airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage, empennage, and both wings. The pilot reported there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or anomalies that would have precluded normal operation of the airplane.

Factual narrative

The solo student pilot reported that he was on final approach for a full stop landing when he observed another airplane waiting for the active runway. He intentionally landed long to accommodate the traffic and then "made [the] decision to keep up speed" in order to exit the runway quickly. He misjudged his speed and the airplane departed the right side of the runway, continued across a taxiway, and then down an embankment before nosing over. He later reported that the wheel brakes were less effective because he had full flaps selected. Also, he had applied aft yoke inputs, which minimized the effectiveness of the nose wheel steering system.A Federal Aviation Administration inspector examined the wreckage and reported that the airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage, empennage, and both wings. The pilot reported there were no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or anomalies that would have precluded normal operation of the airplane.

Aircraft

Registration
N5250B
Reported as
Cessna 152 (NO SERIES)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
15283816
Built
1979
Airframe hours
10,903
Engine
Lycoming O-235 SERIES, 107 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Operator
Jacob Luitjens, doing business as Airventures
Registered owner
West Georgia Airservices Inc
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · August 5, 2016 · 6 hours before
Departed
LGC · LaGrange, GA
Destination
LGC · LaGrange, GA
Airport
CCO · Newnan Coweta County, runway 14, 5,500 × 100 ft, asphalt
Equipment
None

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Student pilot
Age
48
Injuries
None
Certificate
Student
Medical
Class 3, Without waivers/limitations
Seat
Left
Restraint
3-point
Flight hours
43 total · 43 in this make and model · 3 as pilot in command · 10 in the last 90 days

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
Calm
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
82 °F, dew point 73 °F
Altimeter
30.23 inHg
Observed at
CCO

Docket · 3

The files NTSB released with the investigation on September 21, 2016, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 4.8 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.