ERA22LA171

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 172 · Sparta, TN · March 27, 2022

Accident · No injuriesClass 3 · LimitedFinal report
Date
March 27, 2022, 11:30 local (16:30 UTC)
Place
Sparta, TN · runway 4
Injuries
2 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N8431UCessna 172
Defining event
Landing-flare/touchdown: Aircraft structural failure
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed
Report
Approved by Office Director
Investigation class
Class 3
NTSB office
Eastern Region Aviation
Parties
FAA/FSDO
FAA report
20220327011869I
Case key
104833

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

Maintenance personnel’s failure to properly affix left main landing gear components, which led to the failure of the left main landing gear during the accident flight.

Findings · 2

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

AircraftAircraft › Aircraft structures · FailureCessna 172F: 1 caseAll aircraft: 72 cases
Maintenance: repairPersonnel issues › Task performance · Maintenance personnelCessna 172F: 1 caseAll aircraft: 99 cases

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

During a touch-and-go landing, the student pilot and flight instructor heard a pop sound as they touched down. The student pilot initiated a go-around and then informed the instructor that the left main landing gear (LMLG) had separated from the airplane. They flew for about 2.5 hours to reduce the airplane’s fuel load before attempting to land with the fractured LMLG. The landing was uneventful and the airplane came to a stop on the runway. According to the instructor the LMLG struck the horizontal stabilizer when it separated, resulting in substantial damage. Examination of the left main landing gear spring strut revealed that the step bracket was tack welded onto the spring strut. According to the airplane manufacturer, step brackets can only be affixed to the spring strut using an approved epoxy adhesive; welding on the spring strut is not permitted. This improper maintenance resulted in a fatigue crack and the failure of the gear during the accident flight due to overstress.

Factual narrative

On March 27, 2022, about 1130 central daylight time, a Cessna 172, N8431U, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Sparta, Tennessee. The student pilot and flight instructor were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 instructional flight. According to the instructor, the student pilot was practicing touch-and-go landings. They heard a “pop” sound as the airplane touched down. The student pilot initiated a go-around and then informed the instructor that the left main landing gear (LMLG) had separated from the airplane. They flew for about 2.5 hours to reduce the airplane’s fuel load before attempting to land with the fractured LMLG. The landing was uneventful, and the airplane came to a stop on the runway. According to the instructor, the LMLG struck the horizontal stabilizer when it separated, resulting in substantial damage. The LMLG spring strut was examined by the National Transportation Safety Board Materials Laboratory. The LMLG spring strut fractured where the step bracket was affixed to the spring strut. The step bracket was tack welded to the spring strut. No epoxy adhesive was present on the faying surfaces of the step bracket or spring strut. According to the Cessna service manual, step brackets can only be affixed to the spring strut using an approved epoxy adhesive on abrasively blasted surfaces; welding on the spring strut is not permitted. The Materials Laboratory examination also found a fatigue crack that initiated at a tack weld between the step bracket and the spring strut and propagated to a length of about 0.2 inches. The fatigue crack led to an overstress fracture during the accident flight.

Aircraft

Registration
N8431U
Reported as
Cessna 172 (F)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
17252331
Built
1964
Engine
Continental O-300, 145 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Utility; Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · April 17, 2021
Destination
Same as departure
Airport
SRB · Upper Cumberland Regional Airport, runway 4, 6,704 × 100 ft, asphalt
Equipment
Unknown

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 2

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Flight instructor
Age
40
Injuries
None
Certificates
Flight instructor, Commercial
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 2, Without waivers/limitations
Last flight review
May 9, 2020
Seat
Right
Restraint
3-point
Flight hours
1,387 total · 72 in this make and model · 1,308 as pilot in command · 163 in the last 90 days · 62 in the last 30 days
Role
Student pilot
Age
33
Injuries
None
Certificate
Student
Medical
Class 3, Without waivers/limitations
Seat
Left
Restraint
3-point
Flight hours
30 total · 30 in this make and model · 1 as pilot in command · 18 in the last 90 days · 7 in the last 30 days

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
310° at 7 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
43 °F, dew point 19 °F
Altimeter
30.15 inHg
Observed at
SRB
METAR
KSRB 271635Z AUTO 31007KT 270V020 10SM CLR 06/M07 A3015 RMK A01

Docket · 5

The files NTSB released with the investigation on November 8, 2023, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 22.5 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.