ERA24LA152

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 172 · Opelika, AL · March 24, 2024

Accident · Minor injuriesClass 3 · LimitedFinal report
Date
March 24, 2024, 13:30 local (18:30 UTC)
Place
Opelika, AL
Injuries
1 minor
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Initial climb
Aircraft
N863AUCessna 172
Defining event
Initial climb: Loss of engine power (partial)
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed
Report
Approved by Office Director
Investigation class
Class 3
NTSB office
Eastern Region Aviation
Parties
Lycoming Engines, FAA/FSDO
FAA report
20240324021629A
Case key
193982

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

A partial loss of engine power due to a combination of fuel/oil contamination in the fuel injector assembly.

Findings · 2

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Fuel systemAircraft › Aircraft systems · Damaged/degradedTextron 172S: 1 caseAll aircraft: 181 casesProbable cause
Engine (reciprocating)Aircraft › Aircraft power plant · Damaged/degradedTextron 172S: 1 caseAll aircraft: 497 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

**This report was modified on April 29, 2025. Please see the public docket for this investigation to view the original report.** The pilot reported that, after starting the engine, it “sounded slightly rough” and then it ran smoothly “after a few seconds.” She continued with her engine run up and magneto check, neither of which indicated any anomalies. The pilot stated that, during the takeoff roll, the engine indications were “green,” but she was not sure of the static rpm achieved, and the airspeed was increasing “slightly slower than normal.” After reaching a rotation speed of 55 kts, the pilot rotated, but noticed during the initial climb that the engine was not producing full power, and the airspeed was low. She further characterized the engine performance as constant but sluggish. The pilot lowered the nose to prevent an aerodynamic stall and attempted a forced landing, during which the airplane impacted trees and came to rest inverted. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed substantial damage to both wings, the fuselage, and the engine mounts. The examination of the fuel injector assembly found a combination of fuel and oil had contaminated between the air diaphragm and the regulator cover. A service bulletin from the fuel injector manufacturer stated that with this type of contamination, an engine could exhibit “gradually deteriorating idle, difficulty starting and/or cold engine acceleration performance.” With the exception of magneto timing that was 3 degrees advance of the engine’s specification, no evidence of any preimpact mechanical malfunction or failure was observed with the engine or its subsystems. Based on the available information, it is likely that the contamination of the fuel injector assembly resulted in the lack of engine performance described by the pilot.

Factual narrative

On March 24, 2024, at 1330 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 172S, N863AU, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Opelika, Alabama. The private pilot sustained minor injuries. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight. The pilot reported that she completed a preflight inspection of the airplane with no anomalies noted. During engine start, the engine “sounded slightly rough,” and then it ran smoothly “after a few seconds.” During the engine run-up, there were no unusual indications, and the magneto check was normal. During the takeoff roll, the engine indications were “green,” and airspeed was increasing “slightly slower than normal.” The pilot reported that she was not sure of the exact static rpm the engine reached during the takeoff roll but that it did not feel as though the engine was producing the normal amount of power. Upon reaching a rotation speed of 55 kts, the pilot rotated and began the initial climb. As the initial climb progressed, the pilot noticed the airspeed was not accelerating normally, staying about 60 to 65 kts, and the engine was only producing about 1,700-1,750 rpm, despite the throttle and mixture controls being full forward. The pilot subsequently lowered the airplane’s nose and flew toward a forced landing area. She reported that she did not see the engine rpm raise and then drop during the flight and characterized the engine performance as constant but sluggish. The airplane impacted trees and came to rest inverted during the forced landing. Postaccident photographs showed substantial damage to both wings, the fuselage, and the engine mount. A postaccident examination of the airplane found continuity of the engine crankshaft and valvetrain. Compression and suction were observed on all cylinders in the correct firing order when the crankshaft was rotated. Both magnetos remained secure to their fittings on the accessory housing and the timing was found to be 28° before top dead center. The engine data tag showed that the timing for the engine should be 25° before top dead center. The fuel injector assembly was removed from the engine and disassembled. The examination of the fuel injector revealed a combination of fuel/oil contamination between the air diaphragm (Avstar part number AV 2538295) and the regulator cover (part number AV 2577194). Service bulletin AFS-SB10 from the fuel injector manufacturer states, “There have been occasional reports of servo equipped engines that exhibit one or more of the following characteristics - gradually deteriorating idle, difficulty starting and/or cold engine acceleration performance. These engines may have the servo mounted in an updraft, or nearly updraft configuration. Close inspection of the servo may reveal oily contaminant in the bore of the servo that is green/blue in color. It is also possible for this contaminant to migrate into the air section of the regulator.”

Aircraft

Registration
N863AU
Reported as
Cessna 172 (S)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
172S12471
Built
2020
Airframe hours
1,627.6
Engine
Lycoming IO-360-L2A, 180 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal · Part 91
Operator
Auburn University
Registered owner
Auburn University
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Utility; Standard, Normal
Last inspection
100 hour · March 14, 2024 · 33.6 hours before
Airport
AUO · Auburn University Rgnl, runway 11, 4,000 × 75 ft, asphalt
Equipment
Auto-pilot, Electronic multifunction display, ADS-B, Stall warning system, Electronic primary flight display

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
18
Injuries
Minor
Certificate
Private
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Medical
Class 1, With waivers/limitations
Last flight review
July 31, 2023
Seat
Left
Restraint
3-point
Flight hours
135 total · 96 in this make and model · 55 as pilot in command · 13 in the last 90 days · 1 in the last 30 days · 0 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
90° at 7 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
66 °F, dew point 43 °F
Altimeter
30.02 inHg
Observed at
AUO, 1 nm away
METAR
METAR KAUO 241856Z AUTO VRB06KT 10SM CLR 19/06 A3002 RMK AO2 SLP187 T01940056

Docket · 13

The files NTSB released with the investigation on April 2, 2025, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 8.8 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.