- Date
- October 5, 1993, 21:30 local (Oct 6, 1993, 02:30 UTC)
- Place
- Southlake, TX
- Injuries
- 3 uninjured
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Phase of flight
- Landing
- Aircraft
- N8090MCessna 310I
- Weather
- Visual (VMC) · Night/dark
- Status
- Completed · report August 1, 1994
- Report
- Approved by Office Director
- FAA report
- 19931005037799A
- Case key
- 18949
From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.
On this page
Probable cause
Aircraft control not maintained by the private pilot receiving instruction. Factors were rough runway, runway edge lights inoperative, dark night conditions, brakes restricted due to an out of rig rudder system, and inadequate CFI supervision.
Sequence of events
NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.
Analysis
The private pilot flying the airplane from the left seat was receiving dual instruction from a CFI in the right seat. Twelve out of 33 runway edge lights were inoperative and it was a dark night. As the airplane hit a bump on the runway, it veered to the left striking a runway light, a pole, and a hangar. Both pilots reported applying right rudder and brakes. A mechanic's examination of the rudder and brakes revealed that when full right rudder was applied by the right seat pilot, the right brake pedal contacted the firewall. This prevented full right brake application by either pilot.
Factual narrative
On October 5, 1993, approximately 2130 central daylight time, a Cessna 310I, N8090M, sustained substantial damage near Southlake, Texas, following a loss of control during the landing roll. The flight instructor, the private pilot receiving instruction, and the passenger were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local instructional flight.
During interviews, conducted by Federal Aviation Administration inspectors, with the private pilot, who was receiving multiengine instruction, and the passenger, the following information was revealed. The airplane hit a bump in the runway and veered to the left side of the runway. The airplane hit a runway landing light and the left wing struck the hangar. The private pilot further stated that both pilots were applying right rudder and right brakes.
In the enclosed Pilot/Operator report the flight instructor reported that "it appeared the brakes were not working properly."
The private pilot reported, during a personal interview conducted by the investigator-in-charge and on the enclosed Pilot/Operator report, that the airplane landed to the left of the center line of runway 17. He further reported that the airplane "hit a bump on the runway and veered to the left of the runway" and into the grass. As the airplane continued the ground roll, both pilots applied full right rudder and brakes. He stated that "it felt as if the aircraft was skidding and with the full right rudder pedal and left braking, the aircraft kept rolling." He further said that he and the flight instructor did not have right braking with full right rudder. The student said that several runway lights were not working.
During several telephone interviews, conducted by the investigator-in-charge, and on the enclosed passenger statement, the passenger/mechanic revealed that the left main wheel struck the runway light, the airplane went completely off the runway and onto the grass which was wet with "heavy dew." The aircraft slid until it hit a pole, subsequently impacted a hangar, and groundlooped as it came to rest. The left wing tip, fuel tank, wing spar, aileron, and right main gear were damaged. Upon examining the braking system, the mechanic stated "when I applied full right rudder and attempted to apply right brakes" the "right brake pedal contacts with the firewall preventing either pilot from braking on the right."
A Federal Aviation Administration inspector examination revealed that 12 of 33 runway edge lights were inoperative.
The airplane was released to the owner following the investigation.
Aircraft
- Registration
- N8090M
- Reported as
- Cessna 310I
- Category
- Airplane
- Serial number
- 310I0090
- Airframe hours
- 3,614
- Engine
- Continental IO-470-U, 260 horsepower, reciprocating
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Instructional · Part 91
- Registered owner
- Alam. Farrukh
- Airworthiness certificate
- Standard, Normal
- Last inspection
- Annual · May 12, 1993 · 56 hours before
- Departed
- 23F
- Destination
- 23F
- Flight plan
- Unknown
- Airport
- 23F · Goode, runway 17, 3,100 × 40 ft, asphalt
Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.
Flight crew
As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.
- Role
- Pilot
- Age
- 24
- Certificate
- Commercial
- Airplane ratings
- Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
- Instrument ratings
- Airplane
- Medical
- Class 2, Valid Medical--w/ waivers/lim
- Seat
- Right
- Flight hours
- 913 total · 11 in this make and model · 786 as pilot in command · 35 in the last 90 days · 35 in the last 30 days · 4 in the last 24 hours
Weather
- Conditions
- Visual (VMC) · Night/dark
- Wind
- 110° at 4 knots
- Visibility
- 15 statute miles
- Lowest ceiling
- None
- Temperature
- 73 °F, dew point 64 °F
- Observed at
- DFW, 293 nm away
FAA reports on this event · 1
The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.
Other investigations on N8090M · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.