- Date
- July 1, 1999, 20:40 local (Jul 2, 1999, 01:40 UTC)
- Place
- Houston, TX
- Injuries
- 4 uninjured
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Phase of flight
- Approach
- Aircraft
- N5788Piper PA-24-260
- Weather
- Visual (VMC) · Dusk
- Status
- Completed · report June 22, 2000
- Report
- Approved by Office Director
- FAA report
- 19990701008209A
- Case key
- 46681
From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.
On this page
Probable cause
The pilot's failure to maintain the proper descent rate during a forced landing, which resulted in a runway undershoot. Factors were the total loss of engine power for an undetermined reason and the dusk light conditions.
Sequence of events
NTSB’s coding before 2008: each occurrence and phase of flight, and the causes and factors under it. The codes are defined in NTSB’s coding manual.
Analysis
The pilot failed to maintain the proper descent rate during a VFR approach, in dusk light conditions, following a complete loss of engine power, and the airplane undershot the runway. The airplane was on the downwind leg at 1,100 feet agl and was abeam the runway numbers when the pilot extended the landing gear. Simultaneously, she heard a loud bang and noticed a loss of engine power. The pilot advanced the throttle and realized that the engine had lost total power. The pilot stated that she trimmed the airplane to attain the best glide speed, but did not verify the airspeed during the ensuing forced landing. She added that the airplane was descending 'too fast,' and she needed 'more trim to relieve back pressure, but decided to muscle it as best [she] could and try not to stall the airplane.' Subsequently, the airplane's nose wheel contacted a cement drainage ditch at the approach end of the runway. Following the accident, the engine was test run in the airframe and found to operate within the manufacturer's specifications.
Factual narrative
On July 1, 1999, at 2040 central daylight time, a Piper PA-24-260 airplane, N5788, was substantially damaged when it impacted terrain following a complete loss of engine power while executing a VFR approach to the West Houston Airport near Houston, Texas. The commercial pilot, who was one of four partners who owned the airplane, and her three passengers were not injured. Dusk visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 personal flight and a flight plan was not filed. The flight originated from the New Braunfels Municipal Airport, New Braunfels, Texas, at 1950.
According to the pilot and a fuel receipt, the airplane was "topped off" with 18 gallons of 100LL aviation fuel at New Braunfels. Subsequently, the airplane departed New Braunfels for Houston.
The 357-hour pilot reported that the airplane was on a VFR approach to runway 15 at the West Houston Airport. The airplane was on a left downwind leg, level at 1,100 feet agl, and abeam the runway numbers when she extended the landing gear. Simultaneously she heard a "loud bang" and noticed a loss of engine power. The instrument panel lights "flickered," and the illumination in the cockpit failed. The pilot then advanced the throttle and realized that the engine had lost total power. The pilot stated that she trimmed the airplane to attain the best glide speed, but did not verify the airspeed during the ensuing forced landing. She added that the airplane was descending "too fast," and she needed "more trim to relieve back pressure, but decided to muscle it as best [she] could and try not to stall the airplane." Subsequently, the airplane's nose wheel contacted a cement drainage area at the approach end of the runway and collapsed. The left main landing gear penetrated the wing structure, and the airplane slid approximately 250 feet down the runway, coming to a stop upright.
The pilot reported that the following light and weather conditions existed at the time of the accident: dusk light, visibility greater than 10 miles, clear skies, and wind from 150 degrees at 15 knots.
The airplane was equipped with a 260-horsepower Lycoming IO-540-D engine, which was examined and test run at Caulkins Aero, Houston, Texas, under the supervision of an FAA inspector. The spark plugs, magnetos, oil filter, and air filter were examined before the test run and no anomalies were noted. The fuel selector valve "worked free and correct through all of its ranges," and fuel was present in each of the four fuel tanks. The engine was run in the airframe for a total of 28 minutes at various rpm and manifold pressure settings, including the maximum power setting. The engine operated within manufacturer's specifications. For further details reference the enclosed FAA inspector's statement.
Aircraft
- Registration
- N5788
- Reported as
- Piper PA-24-260
- Category
- Airplane
- Serial number
- 24-4580
- Airframe hours
- 4,775
- Engine
- Lycoming IO-540D, 260 horsepower, reciprocating
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal · Part 91
- Registered owner
- David A. Pyle
- Airworthiness certificate
- Standard, Normal
- Last inspection
- Annual · November 1, 1998 · 112 hours before
- Departed
- BAZ · New Braunfels, TX
- Destination
- IWS
- Airport
- IWS · West Hosuton, runway 15, 3,955 × 75 ft, asphalt
Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.
Flight crew
As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.
- Role
- Pilot
- Certificate
- Commercial
- Airplane ratings
- Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
- Instrument ratings
- Airplane
- Medical
- Class 3, Valid Medical--w/ waivers/lim
- Seat
- Left
- Flight hours
- 357 total · 27 in this make and model · 241 as pilot in command
Weather
- Conditions
- Visual (VMC) · Dusk
- Wind
- 150° at 15 knots
- Visibility
- 10 statute miles
- Lowest ceiling
- None
FAA reports on this event · 1
The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.