GAA15LA085

NTSB accident investigation · Destiny 2000 · Eltopia, WA · May 23, 2015

Accident · Serious injuriesLimited investigationFinal report
Date
May 23, 2015, 14:30 local (21:30 UTC)
Place
Eltopia, WA
Injuries
1 serious, 1 minor
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Initial climb
Aircraft
N3376Destiny 2000
Defining event
Initial climb: Loss of control in flight
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report September 24, 2015
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
General Aviation Accidents
Parties
Sokane FSDO (FAA)
FAA report
20150523007799A
Case key
91229

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The flight instructor’s failure to tell the student pilot to abort the takeoff after the powered parachute experienced wing oscillations, which resulted in the student pilot’s loss of aircraft control during initial climb and subsequent impact with terrain. Contributing to the accident was the flight instructor's decision to conduct training in a powered parachute without dual flight controls.

Findings · 5

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Use of equip/info: aircraft controlPersonnel issues › Task performance · Student/instructed pilotDestiny 2000: 1 caseAll aircraft: 9,295 casesProbable cause
Performance/control parameters: lateral/bank controlAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Not attained/maintainedDestiny 2000: 1 caseAll aircraft: 390 casesProbable cause
Performance/control parameters: climb rateAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Not attained/maintainedDestiny 2000: 1 caseAll aircraft: 265 casesProbable cause
Action: lack of actionPersonnel issues › Action/decision · Instructor/check pilotDestiny 2000: 1 caseAll aircraft: 792 casesProbable cause
Info processing/decision: decision making/judgmentPersonnel issues › Action/decision · Instructor/check pilotDestiny 2000: 1 caseAll aircraft: 3,098 casesProbable cause

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The flight instructor and student pilot were departing in the powered parachute during a fly-in event with the student pilot at the flight controls. The flight instructor reported that the powered parachute experienced left-to-right wing oscillations during the takeoff roll and initial climb and that, about 15 ft above ground level, it rotated sharply downward and to the right and then impacted terrain; this was corroborated by video footage provided by an observer on the ground, which also showed that the oscillations worsened during the initial climb. The flight instructor reported that he was monitoring all of the parachute lines during the takeoff roll and initial climb and that he observed no abnormalities that would have adversely affected the parachute's steering mechanism. According to Federal Aviation Administration guidance on powered parachute operations, the takeoff should be aborted if the parachute experiences severe wing oscillations. The guidance also states that "dual controls are required in the aircraft for training." However, the powered parachute was not equipped with dual flight controls. If the powered parachute had been equipped with dual flight controls, it is possible that the flight instructor would have taken control of the flight and aborted the takeoff. Regardless, the flight instructor should have told the student to abort the takeoff when he first noticed the wing oscillations.

Factual narrative

On May 23, 2015, about 1430 pacific daylight time, a Destiny 2000 powered parachute, N3376, impacted terrain during the initial climb from a field near Eltopia, Washington. The flight instructor sustained minor injuries, and the student pilot sustained serious injuries. Day visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the instructional flight, which was operated under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. According to the flight instructor, the aircraft experienced left to right oscillations during the takeoff roll and initial climb, and about 15 feet above ground level, the parachute rotated sharply downward and to the right. The aircraft impacted terrain in a right bank and nose-low attitude. The student pilot was at the flight controls for the entire duration of the flight, and stated in a postaccident interview that he did not make any abrupt control inputs during the takeoff or initial climb. The flight instructor stated that dual flight controls were not installed, and he could not reach the throttle lever. The flight instructor provided a video recording of the accident sequence, which was filmed by an observer on the ground. The footage depicted the accident aircraft experiencing left to right wing oscillations throughout the takeoff roll and the rotation. During the initial climb, the oscillations continued and the aircraft rolled sharply downward and to the right, eventually moving out of the video recorders view. The flight instructor stated there were no mechanical malfunctions or failures with the powered parachute that would have precluded normal operation. In addition, he reported that he was monitoring all parachute lines during the takeoff roll and initial climb, and observed no line-overs or any other abnormalities that would have adversely affected the parachute's steering mechanism. The reported winds at an airport 11 nautical miles away about the time of the accident were from 210 degrees true at 7 knots. The flight instructor reported that he observed a steady direct headwind about 4 to 7 knots before takeoff. During the video, about one minute before the accident powered parachute lifted off, an observer could be heard stating, "The wind has basically come down to nothing." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION According to the Federal Aviation Administration Powered Parachute Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-29), "An oscillating wing forced into takeoff will most likely roll the airframe," and "if the oscillations become too severe, it is best to abort the takeoff and set up again." The handbook additionally states, "Dual controls are required in the aircraft for training."

Aircraft

Registration
N3376
Reported as
Destiny 2000 (NO SERIES)
Category
Powered parachute
Serial number
1C0267
Built
2001
Engine
Rotax 582DCDI, 65 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Airworthiness certificate
Special, Experimental (Special)
Last inspection
Annual · May 31, 2014
Departed
Eltopia, WA
Destination
Eltopia, WA

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 2

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Student pilot
Age
64
Injuries
Serious
Seat
Front
Restraint
4-point
Flight hours
30 total · 30 in this make and model
Role
Flight instructor
Age
57
Injuries
Minor
Certificates
Flight instructor, Sport Pilot
Airplane ratings
Single-engine sea, Single-engine land
Last flight review
October 31, 2014
Seat
Rear
Restraint
4-point
Flight hours
458 total · 1 in this make and model · 306 as pilot in command · 28 in the last 90 days · 12 in the last 30 days · 2 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
210° at 7 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
79 °F, dew point 54 °F
Altimeter
29.95 inHg
Observed at
KPSC, 11 nm away

Docket · 7

The files NTSB released with the investigation on September 4, 2015, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 7.3 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.