GAA16CA364

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 172RG · Manhattan, KS · July 1, 2016

Accident · No injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
July 1, 2016, 10:00 local (16:00 UTC)
Place
Manhattan, KS
Injuries
2 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Landing
Aircraft
N5100VCessna 172RG
Defining event
Landing: Landing gear not configured
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report August 31, 2016
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
General Aviation Accidents
Parties
FAA
FAA report
20160701010229A
Case key
93573

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The flight instructor and pilot receiving instruction's omission to use an appropriate checklist and extend the landing gear prior to landing, which resulted in substantial damage to the aircraft's fuselage and bulkhead.

Findings · 8

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Landing gear system: gear extension and retract sysAircraft › Aircraft systems · Not used/operatedCessna 172RG: 10 casesAll aircraft: 416 casesProbable cause
Use of equip/info: use of checklistPersonnel issues › Task performance · Student/instructed pilotCessna 172RG: 4 casesAll aircraft: 336 casesProbable cause
Use of equip/info: use of checklistPersonnel issues › Task performance · Instructor/check pilotCessna 172RG: 4 casesAll aircraft: 336 casesProbable cause
Action: forgotten action/omissionPersonnel issues › Action/decision · Student/instructed pilotCessna 172RG: 8 casesAll aircraft: 440 casesProbable cause
Action: forgotten action/omissionPersonnel issues › Action/decision · Instructor/check pilotCessna 172RG: 8 casesAll aircraft: 440 casesProbable cause
Attention/monitoring: monitoring other personPersonnel issues › Psychological · Instructor/check pilotCessna 172RG: 1 caseAll aircraft: 200 cases
Use of equip/info: use of equip/systemPersonnel issues › Task performance · Student/instructed pilotCessna 172RG: 1 caseAll aircraft: 1,391 cases
Attention/monitoring: task monitoring/vigilancePersonnel issues › Psychological · Instructor/check pilotCessna 172RG: 1 caseAll aircraft: 330 cases

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The pilot reported that he was receiving instruction in an airplane with retractable landing gear. He further reported that during landing, the airplane touched down and began sliding on the concrete runway, and he "knew something was wrong". The flight instructor reported that he was the pilot in command of the airplane and that on final both pilots were on the controls. He further reported that he realized there was an issue when he heard metal on pavement. The airplane impacted the runway with its landing gear retracted, causing substantial damage to the fuselage and bulkhead. The pilot receiving instruction reported that there were no pre impact mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation. There was a post-accident landing gear aural warning horn check/test conducted, with no maintenance issues found.

Factual narrative

The pilot reported that he was receiving instruction in an airplane with retractable landing gear. He further reported that during landing, the airplane touched down and began sliding on the concrete runway, and he "knew something was wrong". The flight instructor reported that he was the pilot in command of the airplane and that on final both pilots were on the controls. He further reported that he realized there was an issue when he heard metal on pavement. The airplane impacted the runway with its landing gear retracted, causing substantial damage to the fuselage and bulkhead. The pilot receiving instruction reported that there were no pre impact mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation. There was a post-accident landing gear aural warning horn check/test conducted, with no maintenance issues found.

Aircraft

Registration
N5100V
Reported as
Cessna 172RG (NO SERIES)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
172RG0450
Built
1980
Airframe hours
9,529.3
Engine
Lycoming O-360-F1A6, 180 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · May 4, 2016
Departed
MHK · Manhattan, KS
Destination
MHK · Manhattan, KS
Airport
MHK · Manhattan Rgnl, runway 03, 7,000 × 150 ft, concrete
Equipment
Electronic flight bag or handheld device

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 2

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Student pilot
Age
35
Injuries
None
Certificate
Private
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land
Medical
Class 3, Without waivers/limitations
Last flight review
April 4, 2016
Seat
Left
Flight hours
450 total · 2 in this make and model · 450 as pilot in command · 15 in the last 90 days · 5 in the last 30 days · 2 in the last 24 hours
Role
Flight instructor
Age
32
Injuries
None
Certificates
Flight instructor, Commercial
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine sea, Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, With waivers/limitations
Last flight review
July 28, 2016
Seat
Right
Flight hours
350 total · 20 in this make and model · 243 as pilot in command · 90 in the last 90 days · 50 in the last 30 days · 4 in the last 24 hours

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
70° at 8 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
None
Temperature
75 °F, dew point 61 °F
Altimeter
30.13 inHg
Observed at
KMHK, 1 nm away

Docket · 7

The files NTSB released with the investigation on August 16, 2016, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 4.3 MB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.