GAA17CA232

NTSB accident investigation · Cessna 172 · Houston, TX · April 11, 2017

Accident · No injuriesData collectionFinal report
Date
April 11, 2017, 11:50 local (16:50 UTC)
Place
Houston, TX
Injuries
2 uninjured
Damage
Substantial damage
Phase of flight
Takeoff
Aircraft
N92873Cessna 172
Defining event
Takeoff-rejected takeoff: Loss of control on ground
Weather
Visual (VMC) · Day
Status
Completed · report June 20, 2017
Report
Approved by Office Director
NTSB office
General Aviation Accidents
Parties
FAA
FAA report
20170411020989A
Case key
95002

From the NTSB’s public API. By law, NTSB reports can’t be used as evidence in lawsuits over the accident.

On this page

Probable cause

The pilot’s delayed attempt to abort the takeoff with a tailwind, which resulted in a runway overrun.

Findings · 4

NTSB’s coded findings. Those marked are part of the probable cause; the rest are factors or other findings. Under each, the cases with the same finding.

Aircraft capability: takeoff distanceAircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Capability exceededCessna 172M: 1 caseAll aircraft: 67 casesProbable cause
Action: delayed actionPersonnel issues › Action/decision · PilotCessna 172M: 20 casesAll aircraft: 894 casesProbable cause
Wind: sudden wind shiftEnvironmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena · Effect on operationCessna 172M: 2 casesAll aircraft: 114 cases
Wind: tailwindEnvironmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena · Effect on operationCessna 172M: 7 casesAll aircraft: 594 cases

Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event is the one that best describes the accident. Under each, the cases with the same event anywhere in their sequence.

Analysis

The pilot of the float-equipped airplane reported that, before takeoff, the windsock showed "no significant wind" and that the control tower "confirmed using a southerly traffic pattern." He added that, during the takeoff from the waterway, the airplane initially accelerated as expected. He further added that "it became clear that the take-off run was not progressing as anticipated" and that he decided to abort the takeoff. He brought the power to idle and applied back pressure to the control yoke. The airplane slid onto the grass embankment at the end of the runway and came to rest on the adjacent taxiway. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage. The pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. Weather observations from the airport showed that, from about 20 minutes before the accident to 60 minutes after the accident, the wind varied in direction from 360° to 050°, and the speed varied from 4 to 11 knots, with a peak wind from 360° at 30 knots. The pilot departed waterway 17W.

Factual narrative

The pilot of the float-equipped airplane reported that prior to takeoff, the windsock showed "no significant wind" and the control tower "confirmed using a southerly traffic pattern". He added that during the takeoff on the waterway, the airplane initially accelerated as expected. He further added that "it became clear that the take-off run was not progressing as anticipated" and decided to abort the takeoff. He brought the power to idle and applied back pressure to the control yoke. The airplane slid onto the grass embankment at the end of the runway and came to rest on the adjacent taxiway. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage. The pilot reported that there were no preaccident mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. Weather observations, located on the airport, showed that from about 20 minutes before the accident to 60 minutes after the accident, the wind varied in direction from 360° to 050°, and the speed varied 4 to 11 knots, with a peak wind of 360° at 30 knots. The pilot departed waterway 17W.

Aircraft

Registration
N92873
Reported as
Cessna 172 (M)
Category
Airplane
Serial number
17261636
Built
1973
Airframe hours
4,518
Engine
Lycoming O-320-E2D, 160 horsepower, reciprocating
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional · Part 91
Airworthiness certificate
Standard, Normal
Last inspection
Annual · January 16, 2017
Departed
DWH · Houston, TX
Destination
DWH · Houston, TX
Airport
DWH · David Wayne Hooks Memorial, runway 17W, 2,500 × 80 ft, water
Equipment
None

Matched to the registry by N-number and the event date; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

Flight crew · 2

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

Role
Pilot
Age
50
Injuries
None
Certificates
Commercial, Military
Airplane ratings
Single-engine land, Multi-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 3, Without waivers/limitations
Last flight review
March 17, 2016
Seat
Left
Restraint
3-point
Flight hours
1,820 total · 6 in this make and model · 1,510 as pilot in command · 18 in the last 90 days · 7 in the last 30 days · 3 in the last 24 hours
Role
Check pilot
Age
52
Injuries
None
Certificates
Flight engineer, Airline transport, Flight instructor
Airplane ratings
Multi-engine land, Single-engine sea, Single-engine land
Instrument ratings
Airplane
Medical
Class 1, Without waivers/limitations
Seat
Right

Weather

Conditions
Visual (VMC) · Day
Wind
10° at 11 knots
Visibility
10 statute miles
Lowest ceiling
1,500 ft broken
Temperature
72 °F, dew point 68 °F
Altimeter
30.19 inHg
Observed at
KDWH, 1 nm away

Docket · 2

The files NTSB released with the investigation on May 30, 2017, on NTSB’s docket system: statements, records, photos and specialists’ reports. 942 KB in all.

FAA reports on this event · 1

The FAA’s own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date.